Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31227997›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2019

Why include the humanities in medical studies?

Giovanni Boniolo, Raffaella Campaner, Sergio Coccheri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Why include the humanities in medical studies?Internal and emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
  5. Why include the humanities in medical studies: comment.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
  6. Why include the humanities in medical studies? Comment.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Why include humanities in medical studies: comment.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giovanni BonioloDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Specialist Surgery, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara, 64, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Raffaella CampanerDepartment of Philosophy and Communication Studies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni, 38, 40126, Bologna, Italy. raffaella.campaner@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4642-0337
Sergio CoccheriUniversity of Bologna, Via Ugo Bassi, 13, 40121, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relation between philosophy and biomedicine has been reassessed and rethought in the last few years: on the one hand, philosophy of science has paid increasing attention to actual modes of biomedical research and clinical practice; on the other, classes in philosophy, and more generally, in the humanities, have started entering medical curricula. However, the role of philosophy in medical education is not yet unanimously recognized, with situations differing significantly in various national and international contexts. In line with the tradition in Italy and other countries of reflecting on clinical methodology and with the recent initiatives at the crossroads between medicine and philosophy, this contribution aims to argue for the mutual relevance of medicine and philosophy in educational processes, and to suggest some possible forms of implementation of their interactions.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalHumanitiesHumansItalyMedical curriculaMedical humanitiesPhilosophy of science for medicine

Identifiers

PMID31227997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.