Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31227968›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

Two-year real-world results of lumbar discectomy with bone-anchored annular closure in patients at high risk of reherniation.

Ardeshir Ardeshiri, Larry E Miller, Claudius Thomé

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European spine journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in European spine journal, 2019.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ardeshir ArdeshiriSection for Spine Surgery, Klinikum Itzehoe, Robert-Koch-Str. 2, 25524, Itzehoe, Germany. aardeshiri@aol.com.
Larry E MillerMiller Scientific Consulting, Inc., 1854 Hendersonville Road, #231, Asheville, NC, USA.
Claudius ThoméDepartment for Neurosurgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Foster-Miller (United States) · USInnsbruck Medical University · ATKlinikum Itzehoe · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the safety and effectiveness of limited lumbar discectomy with additional implantation of an annular closure device (ACD) among patients at high risk of herniation recurrence treated in routine clinical practice.

methodsThis was a prospective, single-center study of lumbar discectomy for sciatica caused by intervertebral disc herniation with adjunctive ACD implantation to reduce herniation recurrence risk among high-risk patients with large annular defects. Patients returned for follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Main outcomes included reoperation, herniation recurrence, back pain severity, leg pain severity, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The minimum important difference was defined as ≥ 20 mm decrease relative to baseline for leg pain severity, ≥ 20 mm decrease for back pain severity, and ≥ 15-point decrease for ODI.

resultsAmong 75 high-risk patients (mean age 45 years, 59% female), the cumulative event incidence through 2 years was 4.0% for reoperation and 1.4% for herniation recurrence. Mean leg pain severity decreased from 73 to 6 (p < 0.001), back pain severity decreased from 51 to 13 (p < 0.001), and ODI decreased from 49 to 7 (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving the minimum important difference was 91% for leg pain, 65% for back pain, and 94% for ODI.

conclusionIn patients at high risk of herniation recurrence following limited lumbar discectomy in routine clinical practice, additional implantation of an ACD was safe and reherniation recurrence rates were low at 2-year follow-up, which is favorably compared to reported rates in high-risk patients.

Indexed as

AdultDisability EvaluationDiskectomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesRecurrenceReoperationSciaticaSecondary PreventionAnnular closureAnnulus fibrosusMicrodiscectomyReherniationReoperation

Identifiers

PMID31227968
OpenAlexW2951852595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.