ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2019
Automated proper lumping for simplification of linear physiologically based pharmacokinetic systems.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tackling High Dimensionality in QSP: Guiding Model Order Reduction With Index Analysis.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Personalised Transdermal Therapy for Chronic Pain with Digital Twin Technology.Current drug targets · 2025Review
- Parameter grouping and co-estimation in physiologically based kinetic models using genetic algorithms.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024Article
- Predicting transdermal fentanyl delivery using physics-based simulations for tailored therapy based on the age.Drug delivery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are an important type of systems model used commonly in drug development before commencement of first-in-human studies. Due to structural complexity, these models are not easily utilised for future data-driven population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses that require simpler models. In the current study we aimed to explore and automate methods of simplifying PBPK models using a proper lumping technique. A linear 17-state PBPK model for fentanyl was identified from the literature. Four methods were developed to search the optimal lumped model, including full enumeration (the reference method), non-adaptive random search (NARS), scree plot plus NARS, and simulated annealing (SA). For exploratory purposes, it was required that the total area under the fentanyl arterial concentration-time curve (AUC) between the lumped and original models differ by 0.002% at maximum. In full enumeration, a 4-state lumped model satisfying the exploratory criterion was found. In NARS, a lumped model with the same number of lumped states was found, requiring a large number of random samples. The scree plot provided a starting lumped model to NARS and the search completed within a short time. In SA, a 4-state lumped model was consistently delivered. In simplify an existing linear fentanyl PBPK model, SA was found to be robust and the most efficient and may be suitable for general application to other larger-scale linear systems. Ultimately, simplified PBPK systems with fundamental mechanisms may be readily used for data-driven PK analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.