ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2019
Strategies for Minimizing Occupational Radiation Exposure in Cardiac Imaging.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fungal Melanins and Applications in Healthcare, Bioremediation and Industry.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Best practice for the nuclear medicine technologist in CT-based attenuation correction and calcium score for nuclear cardiology.European journal of hybrid imaging · 2020Review
- Radioprotective efficacy of plastic polymer against the toxicogenomic effects of radiopharmaceuticalRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2020Article
- The hidden risk of ionizing radiation in the operating room: a survey among 258 orthopaedic surgeons in Brazil.Patient safety in surgery · 2020Article
- Cardiac catheterization real-time dynamic radiation dose measurement to estimate lifetime attributable risk of cancer.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewRadiation safety has been at the center of interest of both researchers and healthcare institutions. This review will summarize and shed light on the various techniques adapted to reduce staff exposure to ionizing radiation (IR) in the field of cardiac imaging. RECENT
findingsIn the last years, with the advance of awareness and the development of new technologies, there have been several tools and techniques adapted. The breakthrough of several technologies to lower radiation dose and shorten the duration of diagnostic tests associated with IR, the use of protection devices by staff members, and mostly the awareness of exposure to IR are the hallmark of these advances. Using all these measures has led to a significant decrease in staff exposure to IR. Reducing staff exposure to meet the "As Low As Reasonably Achievable" principle is feasible. This review introduces the most important strategies applied in cardiac imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.