Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31227837›Full record

ReviewHuman molecular genetics2019

Gene therapy for hearing loss.

Ryotaro Omichi, Seiji B Shibata, Cynthia C Morton, Richard J H Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human molecular genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of the NHS R67 Monogenic Hearing Loss Panel in a Single UK Centre.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Recent Progress in Mechanism-Based Therapies forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mutational spectrum in patients with dominant non-syndromic hearing loss in Austria.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ryotaro OmichiMolecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratories, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Seiji B ShibataMolecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratories, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Cynthia C MortonDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Richard J H SmithMolecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratories, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
University of Iowa · USBroad Institute · US

Funding

NONSYNDROMIC HEARING LOSS--A COLLABORATIVE STUDYR01DC002842 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SMITH, RICHARD J.H. · 1996 to 2024
$12.7M
TRAINING GRANT IN GENETICST32GM007748 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI Anne O'Donnell-Luria, Louise Wilkins-Haug · 1985 to 2026
$12.0M
Optimizing Genetic Testing for Deafness for Clinical DiagnosticsR01DC012049 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI TERRY A BRAUN, Thomas L. Casavant · 2011 to 2026
$8.7M
SEQuencing a Baby for an Optimal Outcome (SEQaBOO)R01DC015052 · NIDCD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MORTON, CYNTHIA CASSON · 2016 to 2020
$3.8M
Autosomal Dominant Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss - Its Genetic Diagnosis and TreatmentR01DC017955 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SMITH, RICHARD J.H. · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002842NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012049NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015052NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017955NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is the most common sensory disorder. Its underlying etiologies include a broad spectrum of genetic and environmental factors that can lead to hearing loss that is congenital or late onset, stable or progressive, drug related, noise induced, age related, traumatic or post-infectious. Habilitation options typically focus on amplification using wearable or implantable devices; however exciting new gene-therapy-based strategies to restore and prevent SNHL are actively under investigation. Recent proof-of-principle studies demonstrate the potential therapeutic potential of molecular agents delivered to the inner ear to ameliorate different types of SNHL. Correcting or preventing underlying genetic forms of hearing loss is poised to become a reality. Herein, we review molecular therapies for hearing loss such as gene replacement, antisense oligonucleotides, RNA interference and CRISPR-based gene editing. We discuss delivery methods, techniques and viral vectors employed for inner ear gene therapy and the advancements in this field that are paving the way for basic science research discoveries to transition to clinical trials.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyAnimalsBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicDisease ManagementDisease Models, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGene ExpressionGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VectorsHearing LossHumansTransgenesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31227837
PMCPMC6796998
OpenAlexW2951464551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.