ArticleScientific reports2019
Estimating Y-Str Mutation Rates and Tmrca Through Deep-Rooting Italian Pedigrees.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering the genetic diversity in the Arabian Peninsula and Africa: insights from Y-STR data.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Forensic applications of rapidly mutating Y-STR markers: current status and future perspectives.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Review
- Review
- Genetic Diversity Based on Human Y Chromosome Analysis: A Bibliometric Review Between 2014 and 2023.Cureus · 2024Review
- Article
- Large-scale pedigree analysis highlights rapidly mutating Y-chromosomal short tandem repeats for differentiating patrilineal relatives and predicting their degrees of consanguinity.Human genetics · 2023Article
- eSMC: a statistical model to infer admixture events from individual genomics data.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Article
- Empirical Evidence on Enhanced Mutation Rates of 19 RM-YSTRs for Differentiating Paternal Lineages.Genes · 2022Article
- Developmental validation of the Microreader™ RM-Y ID System: a new rapidly mutating Y-STR 17-plex system for forensic application.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- Y-chromosome variability and genetic history of Commons from Northern Italy.American journal of physical anthropology · 2021Article
- Twenty-Seven Y-Chromosome Short Tandem Repeats Analysis of Italian Mummies of the 16th and 18th Centuries: An Interdisciplinary Research.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the population genomics era, the study of Y-chromosome variability is still of the greatest interest for several fields ranging from molecular anthropology to forensics and genetic genealogy. In particular, mutation rates of Y-chromosomal Short Tandem Repeats markers (Y-STRs) are key parameters for different interdisciplinary applications. Among them, testing the patrilineal relatedness between individuals and calculating their Time of Most Recent Common Ancestors (TMRCAs) are of the utmost importance. To provide new valuable estimates and to address these issues, we typed 47 Y-STRs (comprising Yfiler, PowerPlex23 and YfilerPlus loci, the recently defined Rapidly Mutating [RM] panel and 11 additional markers often used in genetic genealogical applications) in 135 individuals belonging to 66 deep-rooting paternal genealogies from Northern Italy. Our results confirmed that the genealogy approach is an effective way to obtain reliable Y-STR mutation rate estimates even with a limited number of samples. Moreover, they showed that the impact of multi-step mutations and backmutations is negligible within the temporal scale usually adopted by forensic and genetic genealogy analyses. We then detected a significant association between the number of mutations within genealogies and observed TMRCAs. Therefore, we compared observed and expected TMRCAs by implementing a Bayesian procedure originally designed by Walsh (2001) and showed that the method yields a good performance (up to 96.72%), especially when using the Infinite Alleles Model (IAM).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.