Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31227714›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Integrative inference of subclonal tumour evolution from single-cell and bulk sequencing data.

Salem Malikic, Katharina Jahn, Jack Kuipers, S Cenk Sahinalp, Niko Beerenwinkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Sc-TUSV-Ext: Single-Cell Clonal Lineage Inference from Single Nucleotide Variants, Copy Number Alterations, and Structural Variants.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Salem MalikicSchool of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, BC, Canada.
Katharina JahnDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, 4058, Switzerland.
Jack KuipersDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, 4058, Switzerland.
S Cenk SahinalpDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, 47405, IN, USA. cenksahi@indiana.edu.
Niko BeerenwinkelDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, 4058, Switzerland. niko.beerenwinkel@bsse.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0573-6119

Funding

Compressive genomics for large omics data sets: Algorithms applications & toolsR01GM108348 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BERGER, BONNIE · 2013 to 2019
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the clonal architecture and evolutionary history of a tumour poses one of the key challenges to overcome treatment failure due to resistant cell populations. Previously, studies on subclonal tumour evolution have been primarily based on bulk sequencing and in some recent cases on single-cell sequencing data. Either data type alone has shortcomings with regard to this task, but methods integrating both data types have been lacking. Here, we present B-SCITE, the first computational approach that infers tumour phylogenies from combined single-cell and bulk sequencing data. Using a comprehensive set of simulated data, we show that B-SCITE systematically outperforms existing methods with respect to tree reconstruction accuracy and subclone identification. B-SCITE provides high-fidelity reconstructions even with a modest number of single cells and in cases where bulk allele frequencies are affected by copy number changes. On real tumour data, B-SCITE generated mutation histories show high concordance with expert generated trees.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAlgorithmsClonal EvolutionComputational BiologyDatasets as TopicDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationNeoplasmsPhylogenySingle-Cell AnalysisSoftware

Identifiers

PMID31227714
PMCPMC6588593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.