Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31227536›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

Socioeconomic circumstances and respiratory function from childhood to early adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vânia Rocha, Sara Soares, Silvia Stringhini, Sílvia Fraga

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Developmental Origins of Asthma and COPD.Annual review of physiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Development of the Respiratory System During Adolescence.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Social determinants of respiratory health from birth: still of concern in the 21st century?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vânia RochaEPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-6387
Sara SoaresEPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Silvia StringhiniInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sílvia FragaEPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDisadvantaged socioeconomic circumstances in early life have the potential to impact lung function. Thus, this study aimed to summarise evidence on the association between socioeconomic circumstances and respiratory function from childhood to young adulthood.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines, Medline, ISI-Web of Science and Scopus were searched from inception up to January 2018. Original studies on the association between socioeconomic circumstances and respiratory function in early ages (ie, participants younger than 25 years of age) were investigated. Two investigators independently evaluated articles, applied the exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis of the standardised mean difference and 95% CI in respiratory function between participants from different socioeconomic circumstances was conducted, using a random-effects model.

resultsThirty-three papers were included in this review and 23 showed that disadvantaged socioeconomic circumstances were significantly associated with reduced respiratory function. The meta-analysis including seven papers showed a significant difference of -0.31 (95% CI -0.42 to -0.21) litres in forced expiratory volume in the first second between children, adolescents and young adults from disadvantaged versus advantaged socioeconomic circumstances. Specifically a difference of -0.31 (95% CI -0.51 to -0.10) litres in girls and -0.43 (95% CI -0.51 to -0.35) litres in boys was observed.

conclusionsChildren, adolescents and young adults from disadvantaged socioeconomic circumstances had lower respiratory function, and boys presented higher respiratory health inequalities. This information contributes to explain the social patterning of respiratory diseases, and might enable health policy makers to tackle respiratory health inequalities at early ages.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgingChildExhalationGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceInhalationRespiratory Tract DiseasesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adultadolescentchildmeta-analysisrespiratory functionsocioeconomic circumstancesyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID31227536
PMCPMC6597002
OpenAlexW2950286621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.