ArticleCMAJ open
The regional medical campus model and rural family medicine practice in British Columbia: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.
Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Rural Generalist Training: The Northern Regional Integrated Clerkship, a Blended Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship Innovation in Northern British Columbia.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Recruiting rural youth to healthcare careers: a scoping review protocol.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Article
- Characteristics of Canadian physicians and their associations with practice patterns: a scoping review.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Article
- Bridging Gaps in Diabetic Nephropathy Care: A Narrative Review Guided by the Lived Experiences of Patient Partners.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2022Review
- Comprehensiveness of distributed medical education systems: a regional population-based perspective.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- The relationship between regional medical campus enrollment and rates of matching to family medicine residency.Canadian medical education journal · 2020Article
- Establishing Regional Medical Campuses to Ensure Comparable Experiences: Recommendations From a Narrative Review.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegional medical campuses have been implemented across North America to address gaps in the physician workforce. We report findings from a study that examined the association between a combined model of regional medical campuses and students' decision to enter rural family medicine practice.
methodsIn 2004, the University of British Columbia added 2 regional medical campuses, 1 in a large population centre in a rural and coastal context and 1 in a medium-sized population centre in an isolated northern and rural context. Data were extracted from the University of British Columbia's Medical Education Database. Multivariable logistic regression examined the relationship of age, sex, rural background and campus location to students' choice of rural family medicine practice.
resultsThere was an association between campus location and choice of family medicine versus other specialties. A rural background (odds ratio [OR] 2.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-6.21) and training at either of the 2 regional medical campuses (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.19-8.83 and OR 5.38, 95% CI 2.24-12.91) predicted rural family practice.
interpretationChoosing to practise family medicine in a rural location was associated with having a rural background and having trained at a regional medical campus. These early results suggest that a combined regional campus model in medical education contributes to the rural family practice workforce.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.