ArticleArthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association2019
Increases in Joint Laxity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Are Associated With Sagittal Biomechanical Asymmetry.
Article in Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clearance Criteria for Determining Eligibility for Force Plate Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Early Cartilage Degeneration With T1ρ and T2 Analysis in Medial Tibial Cartilage and 10-Year Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis Progression After ACL Reconstruction.The American journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Jumping into recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of discriminatory and responsive force plate parameters in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during countermovement and drop jumps.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Short-Term Evaluation of Bone-ACL-Bone Complex Allograft in ACL Reconstruction in a Rabbit Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Criteria Used to Determine Unrestricted Return to Activity After ACL Reconstruction in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Review
- Protocol for the systematic review of return-to-activity criteria in adolescent patients following an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Kinetic measurement system use in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review of methodological approaches.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cadaver Donors: What about Tissues Used as Allografts?Membranes · 2021Review
- Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps strength after anatomical versus non-anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Motion Sensors-Based Machine Learning Approach for the Identification of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Gait Patterns in On-the-Field Activities in Rugby Players.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Patients With Abnormal Limb Kinetics at 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Have an Increased Risk of Persistent Medial Meniscal Abnormality at 3 Years.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the longitudinal changes in landing mechanics and knee kinematics for patients both before and 3 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to investigate the association between changes in landing mechanics and magnetic resonance knee kinematics.
methodsThirty-one ACLR patients were included in the study. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging and biomechanical analysis of a drop-landing task using the injured knee and contralateral knee preoperatively and at 6 months and 3 years after ACLR. For evaluations of knee joint anteroposterior laxity, tibial position was calculated using quantitative loaded magnetic resonance methods.
resultsThe ACLR knee exhibited a significantly lower peak vertical ground reaction force and peak external knee flexion moment and angle at 6 months compared with the contralateral knee; however, the differences were resolved at 3 years. Tibial position was significantly more anterior on the injured side, and the side-to-side difference (SSD) in tibial position exhibited a significant increase from 6 months to 3 years. Among ACLR knees, a greater SSD in peak knee flexion moment at 6 months was associated with an increase in the SSD in anterior tibial translation from 6 months to 3 years.
conclusionsAlthough landing mechanics and clinical outcomes recovered in patients with ACLR in this study, anteroposterior translation failed to be restored at 3 years after surgery. In addition, patients who have low knee flexion moments in early stages could have greater anteroposterior laxity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because of the adverse consequences of abnormal knee kinetics on anterior laxity after ACLR, efforts to improve knee movement patterns should be initiated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.