Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31227277›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2019

Reflectance confocal microscopy confirms residual basal cell carcinoma on clinically negative biopsy sites before Mohs micrographic surgery: A prospective study.

Cristian Navarrete-Dechent, Miguel Cordova, Saud Aleissa, Konstantinos Liopyris, Stephen W Dusza, William Phillips, Anthony M Rossi, Erica H Lee, Ashfaq A Marghoob, Kishwer S Nehal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. [Use of modern imaging in dermatosurgery].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Combination of Fractional CODermatology practical & conceptual · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Non-invasive imaging techniques in presurgical margin assessment of basal cell carcinoma: Current evidence.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Known and new facts on basal cell carcinoma.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristian Navarrete-DechentDepartment of Dermatology, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Miguel CordovaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Saud AleissaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Konstantinos LiopyrisDepartment of Dermatology, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Stephen W DuszaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
William PhillipsDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Anthony M RossiDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Erica H LeeDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ashfaq A MarghoobDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kishwer S NehalDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: nehalk@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiopsy specimens from patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) can present to surgery with no clinically residual tumor, complicating treatment decisions.

objectiveTo evaluate reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) for the assessment of residual BCC following biopsy.

methodsConsecutive patients with biopsy-proven BCC and no clinical evidence of residual tumor who had been referred for Mohs micrographic surgery were included. Biopsy sites were imaged with a handheld RCM device. On the basis of RCM evaluation, cases were labeled RCM positive or RCM negative. Mohs micrographic surgery was performed in all cases; margins and 15-μm serial vertical sectioning were evaluated.

resultsA total of 61 patients were included (mean age, 61.7 years [standard deviation, 12.2 years]; range, 37-87 years); 60.7% were women. The mean lesion size was 5.1 mm (range, 3-12 mm); 73.8% of patients were positive on RCM, and 68.9% had residual BCC on histopathologic examination. The rates of RCM sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 92.8%, 68.4%, 86.6%, and 81.2%, respectively. Three cases of BCC (high-risk, infiltrative, and basosquamous) were missed with use of RCM. When high-risk subtypes were excluded (n = 5), sensitivity and negative predictive value were both 100%. LIMITATIONS: RCM can miss deep-seated residual tumor.

conclusionRCM is a valuable tool for the evaluation of residual BCC following biopsy, with the potential to reduce unnecessary surgical procedures.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBasal Cell CarcinomaBiopsyDermoscopyFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedMohs SurgeryNeoplasm, ResidualPredictive Value of TestsProspective Studiesbasal cell carcinomabiopsydermoscopyMohs micrographic surgeryreflectance confocal microscopyresidualsurgery

Identifiers

PMID31227277
PMCPMC6635070
OpenAlexW2950575155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.