Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31227225›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2019

Direct Delivery of Kidney Transplant Education to Black and Low-Income Patients Receiving Dialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Amy D Waterman, John Devin Peipert, Anna-Michelle McSorley, Christina J Goalby, Jennifer L Beaumont, Leanne Peace

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02268682 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Low-Income End Stage Renal Disease Patients' Transplant Knowledge: A Case Management Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRan2014 to 2016Enrolled558ConditionsEnd Stage Renal DiseaseArmsPatient-Guided, Educator-Guided
NCT06182475 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Increasing Equity in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation Through Effective Patient-Provider Communication

TypeinterventionalSponsorTemple UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled70ConditionsKidney Disease, Chronic, End Stage Renal Disease, Kidney ReplacementArmsEPPComm Provider Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amy D WatermanDivision of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles; Terasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: awaterman@mednet.ucla.edu.
John Devin PeipertDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Anna-Michelle McSorleyDivision of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles.
Christina J GoalbyDivision of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles.
Jennifer L BeaumontTerasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA.
Leanne PeaceMissouri Kidney Program, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Terasaki Foundation · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE &

objectiveCompared with others, black and low-income patients receiving dialysis are less likely to receive kidney transplantation (KT) education within dialysis centers. We examined the efficacy of 2 supplementary KT education approaches delivered directly to patients. STUDY

designProspective, 3-arm parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial. SETTINGS &

participantsAdult, black, and white low-income patients receiving dialysis in Missouri.

interventionPatients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 educational conditions: (1) standard of care, usual KT education provided in dialysis centers (control); (2) Explore Transplant @ Home patient-guided, 4 modules of KT education sent directly to patients using print, video, and text messages; and (3) Explore Transplant @ Home educator-guided, the patient-guided intervention plus 4 telephonic discussions with an educator. OUTCOMES: Primary: patient knowledge of living (LDKT) and deceased donor KT (DDKT). Secondary: informed decision making, change in attitudes in favor of LDKT and DDKT, and change in the number of new steps taken toward KT.

resultsIn intent-to-treat analyses, patients randomly assigned to educator- and patient-guided interventions had greater knowledge gains (1.4 point increase) than control patients (0.8 point increase; P=0.02 and P=0.01, respectively). Compared with control patients, more patients randomly assigned to educator- and patient-guided interventions were able to make informed decisions about starting KT evaluation (82% vs 91% and 95%; P=0.003), pursuing DDKT (70% vs 84% and 84%; P=0.003), and pursuing LDKT (73% vs 91% and 92%; P<0.001). LIMITATIONS: Potential contamination because of patient-level randomization; no assessment of clinical end points.

conclusionsEducation presented directly to dialysis patients, with or without coaching by telephone, increased dialysis patients' KT knowledge and informed decision making without increasing educational burden on providers. FUNDING SOURCE: This project was funded by the National Institutes of Health and Health Resources and Services Administration.

trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT02268682.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanFemaleHumansIncidenceKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPovertyProspective StudiesRenal DialysisTissue Donorsdialysisend-stage renal disease (ESRD)Kidney transplantationlow incomepatient educationpovertyracial disparitiesrandomized controlled trial (RCT)socioeconomic disparitiessocioeconomic status (SES)

Identifiers

PMID31227225
PMCPMC6815244
OpenAlexW2949327344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.