Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31226939›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

Proteomic analysis by iTRAQ-PRM provides integrated insight into mechanisms of resistance in pepper to Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius).

Xiaoxia Wu, Jiaxing Yan, Yahong Wu, Haibo Zhang, Shuangrong Mo, Xiaoying Xu, Fucai Zhou, Haidong Ding

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Calcium Signaling in Plant-Insect Interactions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoxia WuJoint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, China.
Jiaxing YanJoint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, China.
Yahong WuCollege of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, China.
Haibo ZhangCollege of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, China.
Shuangrong MoJoint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, China.
Xiaoying XuJoint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, China.
Fucai ZhouJoint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, China. fczhou@yzu.edu.cn.
Haidong DingJoint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, China. hdding@yzu.edu.cn.
Yangzhou University · CN

Funding

Jiangsu Modern Agriculture (Vegetable) Industry System Innovation Team SXGC[2017]303Jiangsu Science and Technology Support Program BE2017347National Natural Science Foundation of China 31101092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Bemisia tabaci is a major leaf feeding insect pest to pepper (Capsicum annuum), causing serious damage to pepper growth and yield. It is particularly important to study the mechanism of pepper resistance to B. tabaci, and to breed and promote the varieties of pepper resistant to B. tabaci. However, very limited molecular mechanism is available about how plants perceive and defend themselves from the destructive pest. Proteome technologies have provided an idea method for studying plant physiological processes in response to B. tabaci.

resultsHere, a highly resistant genotype and a highly susceptible genotype were exposed to B. tabaci feeding for 48 h to explore the defense mechanisms of pepper resistance to B. tabaci. The proteomic differences between both genotypes were compared using isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ). The quantitative data were validated by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM). The results showed that 37 differential abundance proteins (DAPs) were identified in the RG (resistant genotype), while 17 DAPs were identified in the SG (susceptible genotype) at 48 h after B. tabaci feeding. 77 DAPs were identified when comparing RG with SG without feeding. The DAP functions were determined for the classification of the pathways, mainly involved in redox regulation, stress response, protein metabolism, lipid metabolism and carbon metabolism. Some candidate DAPs are closely related to B. tabaci resistance such as annexin D4-like (ANN4), calreticulin-3 (CRT3), heme-binding protein 2-like (HBP1), acidic endochitinase pcht28-like (PR3) and lipoxygenase 2 (LOX2).

conclusionsTaken together, this study indicates complex resistance-related events in B. tabaci interaction, provides novel insights into the molecular mechanism underlying the response of plant to B. tabaci, and identifies some candidate proteins against B. tabaci attack.

Indexed as

AnimalsCapsicumDisease ResistanceGenotypeHemipteraMass SpectrometryPlant ProteinsProteomeProteomicsPlant ProteinsProteomeBemisia tabaciiTRAQPepperPRMProteomeResistance

Identifiers

PMID31226939
PMCPMC6588876
OpenAlexW2949435248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.