ReviewBiosensors2019
Droplets for Sampling and Transport of Chemical Signals in Biosensing: A Review.
Review in Biosensors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Pipette for High-Resolution Sampling and Delivery of pL Bio-Samples.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Microdialysis coupled with droplet microfluidics and mass spectrometry for determination of neurotransmittersThe Analyst · 2024Article
- Biomedical Applications of Microfluidic Devices: A Review.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Coupling a droplet generator with conventional ESI-MS for quantitative analysis of small-volume samples.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Article
- A Review of Capillary Pressure Control Valves in Microfluidics.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Active Flow Control and Dynamic Analysis in Droplet Microfluidics.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2021Review
- Nanomaterials Synthesis through Microfluidic Methods: An Updated Overview.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Utility of low-cost, miniaturized peristaltic and Venturi pumps in droplet microfluidics.Analytica chimica acta · 2021Article
- Microfluidic chips: recent advances, critical strategies in design, applications and future perspectives.Microfluidics and nanofluidics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The chemical, temporal, and spatial resolution of chemical signals that are sampled and transported with continuous flow is limited because of Taylor dispersion. Droplets have been used to solve this problem by digitizing chemical signals into discrete segments that can be transported for a long distance or a long time without loss of chemical, temporal or spatial precision. In this review, we describe Taylor dispersion, sampling theory, and Laplace pressure, and give examples of sampling probes that have used droplets to sample or/and transport fluid from a continuous medium, such as cell culture or nerve tissue, for external analysis. The examples are categorized, as follows: (1) Aqueous-phase sampling with downstream droplet formation; (2) preformed droplets for sampling; and (3) droplets formed near the analyte source. Finally, strategies for downstream sample recovery for conventional analysis are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.