Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31226785›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Corona Isolation Method Matters: Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry Based Comparison of Protein Corona Compositions Following On-Particle versus In-Solution or In-Gel Digestion.

Klaus Faserl, Andrew J Chetwynd, Iseult Lynch, James A Thorn, Herbert H Lindner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Ex vivo assay for organ-specific cancer cell invasion.Journal of biological engineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Navigating theNanoscale advances · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Klaus FaserlDivision of Clinical Biochemistry, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Klaus.Faserl@i-med.ac.at.
Andrew J ChetwyndAB Sciex UK Ltd., Phoenix House, Lakeside Drive, Warrington, Cheshire WA1 1RX, UK. a.j.chetwynd@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6648-6881
Iseult LynchSchool of Geography Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. I.Lynch@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4250-4584
James A ThornAB Sciex UK Ltd., Phoenix House, Lakeside Drive, Warrington, Cheshire WA1 1RX, UK. Jim.Thorn@sciex.com.
Herbert H LindnerDivision of Clinical Biochemistry, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Herbert.Lindner@i-med.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-1262-9976

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme H2020-NMBP-2016-720952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased understanding of the role of the nanomaterial protein corona in driving nanomaterial uptake into, and impacts on, cells and organisms, and the consequent need for characterization of the corona, has led to a flourishing of methods for isolation and analysis of the constituent proteins over the past decade. However, despite over 700 corona studies to date, very little is understood in terms of which methods provide the most precise and comprehensive characterization of the corona. With the increasing importance of the modeling of corona formation and its correlation with biological impacts, it is timely to properly characterize and validate the isolation approaches used to determine the protein corona. The current work introduces Capillary Electrophoresis with Electro Spray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (CESI-MS) as a novel method for protein corona characterizations and develops an on-particle tryptic digestion method, comparing peptide solubilization solutions and characterizing the recovery of proteins from the nanomaterial surface. The CESI-MS was compared to the gold standard nano-LC-MS for corona analysis and maintained a high degree of reproducibility, while increasing throughput by >3-fold. The on-particle digestion is compared to an in-solution digestion and an in-gel digestion of the protein corona. Interestingly, a range of different protein classes were found to be recovered to greater or lesser extents among the different methods. Apolipoproteins were detected at lower concentrations when a surfactant was used to solubilize peptides, whereas immunoglobulins in general have a high affinity for nanomaterials, and thus show lower recovery using on-particle digestion. The optimized on-particle digestion was validated using 6 nanomaterials and proved capable of recovering in excess of 97% of the protein corona. These are important factors to consider when designing corona studies and modeling corona formation and impacts, highlighting the significance of a comprehensive validation of nanomaterial corona analysis methods.

Indexed as

capillary electrophoresisCE-MSmass-spectrometrynanoparticlesprotein coronaproteomicsreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID31226785
PMCPMC6631359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.