Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31226707›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2019

Modeling anxiety in healthy humans: a key intermediate bridge between basic and clinical sciences.

Christian Grillon, Oliver J Robinson, Brian Cornwell, Monique Ernst

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Mechanistic link between right prefrontal cortical activity and anxious arousal revealed using transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Organization of Anxiety Symptoms Along the Threat Imminence Continuum.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Electrocortical Responses in Anticipation of Avoidable and Inevitable Threats: A Multisite Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Improving Translational Relevance in Preclinical Psychopharmacology (iTRIPP).Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Christian GrillonSection on the Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. christian.grillon@nih.gov.
Oliver J RobinsonUniversity College London, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, London, UK.
Brian CornwellCentre for Mental Health, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.
Monique ErnstSection on the Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Institute of Mental Health · USSwinburne University of Technology · AUUniversity College London · GB

Funding

The Psychophysiology Of Fear And AnxietyZIAMH002798 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI GRILLON, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2022
$29.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002798Medical Research Council MR/K024280/1Medical Research Council MR/R020817/1NIMH NIH HHS ZIA MH002798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models of anxiety disorders are important for elucidating neurobiological defense mechanisms. However, animal models are limited when it comes to understanding the more complex processes of anxiety that are unique to humans (e.g., worry) and to screen new treatments. In this review, we outline how the Experimental Psychopathology approach, based on experimental models of anxiety in healthy subjects, can mitigate these limitations and complement research in animals. Experimental psychopathology can bridge basic research in animals and clinical studies, as well as guide and constrain hypotheses about the nature of psychopathology, treatment mechanisms, and treatment targets. This review begins with a brief review of the strengths and limitations of animal models before discussing the need for human models of anxiety, which are especially necessary to probe higher-order cognitive processes. This can be accomplished by combining anxiety-induction procedures with tasks that probe clinically relevant processes to identify neurocircuits that are potentially altered by anxiety. The review then discusses the validity of experimental psychopathology and introduces a methodological approach consisting of five steps: (1) select anxiety-relevant cognitive or behavioral operations and associated tasks, (2) identify the underlying neurocircuits supporting these operations in healthy controls, 3) examine the impact of experimental anxiety on the targeted operations in healthy controls, (4) utilize findings from step 3 to generate hypotheses about neurocircuit dysfunction in anxious patients, and 5) evaluate treatment mechanisms and screen novel treatments. This is followed by two concrete illustrations of this approach and suggestions for future studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnxietyAnxiety DisordersDisease Models, AnimalHumansModels, BiologicalPsychopathologyResearch DesignTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID31226707
PMCPMC6897969
OpenAlexW2952259319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.