ReviewClinical psychology review2019
Dual-process theory, conflict processing, and delusional belief.
Review in Clinical psychology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of cognitive-motor dual-task training on athletes' cognition and motor performance.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Pooled it
- Examining clinical relevance of interpretation inflexibility in social contexts.Annals of general psychiatry · 2026Article
- A review and integration of models on delusion maintenance.Psychological medicine · 2026Review
- Using machine learning to predict persecutory beliefs based on aetiological models of delusions identified in a systematic literature search.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Learned Insignificance of Credibility Signs.Cognitive science · 2025Article
- Loneliness and delusion-like experiences among women: Mediating role of procrastination and boredom proneness.PloS one · 2025Article
- Psychotherapy Research Domain Criteria: functional mechanisms of treatment and a basic theory of the mind.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
- Acquiescing to intuition in individuals prone to delusions: alterations in dual processes and cognitive control.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Individual differences in belief updating and phasic arousal are related to psychosis proneness.Communications psychology · 2024Article
- Associations of conservatism and jumping to conclusions biases with aberrant salience and default mode network.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024Article
- The role of surgeon's intuition for acute type A aortic dissection in an era of evidence-based medicine: a prospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Self-disorder explained: Yasunaga's "Phantom Space Theory" on schizophrenia.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2023Review
- 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations.Heliyon · 2022Article
- A Neural Circuit for Spirituality and Religiosity Derived From Patients With Brain Lesions.Biological psychiatry · 2022Article
- Association Between Failures in Perceptual Updating and the Severity of Psychosis in Schizophrenia.JAMA psychiatry · 2022Article
- A review of risky decision-making in psychosis-spectrum disorders.Clinical psychology review · 2022Review
- Willingness to vaccinate against SARS-CoV-2: The role of reasoning biases and conspiracist ideation.Vaccine · 2022Article
- Education alone is insufficient to combat online medical misinformation.EMBO reports · 2021Article
- Derationalizing Delusions.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Many reasoning biases that may contribute to delusion formation and/or maintenance are common in healthy individuals. Research indicating that reasoning in the general population proceeds via analytic processes (which depend upon working memory and support hypothetical thought) and intuitive processes (which are autonomous and independent of working memory) may therefore help uncover the source of these biases. Consistent with this possibility, recent studies imply that impaired conflict processing might reduce engagement in analytic reasoning, thereby producing reasoning biases and promoting delusions in individuals with schizophrenia. Progress toward understanding this potential pathway to delusions is currently impeded by ambiguity about whether any of these deficits or biases is necessary or sufficient for the formation and maintenance of delusions. Resolving this ambiguity requires consideration of whether particular cognitive deficits or biases in this putative pathway have causal primacy over other processes that may also participate in the causation of delusions. Accordingly, the present manuscript critically evaluates whether impaired conflict processing is the primary initiating deficit in the generation of reasoning biases that may promote the development and/or maintenance of delusions. Suggestions for future research that may elucidate mechanistic pathways by which reasoning deficits might engender and maintain delusions are subsequently offered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.