Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31226339›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2019

Is sex a biological variable in corneal wound healing?

Ratnakar Tripathi, Elizabeth A Giuliano, Hannah B Gafen, Suneel Gupta, Lynn M Martin, Prashant R Sinha, Jason T Rodier, Michael K Fink, Nathan P Hesemann, Shyam S Chaurasia and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Long-Term Tolerability and Safety of AAV5-Id3 Gene Therapy to Eyes.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mitochondria Transplantation Promotes Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ratnakar TripathiOne-Health One-Medicine Ophthalmology and Vision Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States; Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, United States.
Elizabeth A GiulianoOne-Health One-Medicine Ophthalmology and Vision Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Hannah B GafenOne-Health One-Medicine Ophthalmology and Vision Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States; Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, United States.
Suneel GuptaOne-Health One-Medicine Ophthalmology and Vision Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States; Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, United States.
Lynn M MartinOne-Health One-Medicine Ophthalmology and Vision Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States; Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, United States.
Prashant R SinhaOne-Health One-Medicine Ophthalmology and Vision Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States; Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, United States.
Jason T RodierOne-Health One-Medicine Ophthalmology and Vision Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States; Mason Eye Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Michael K FinkOne-Health One-Medicine Ophthalmology and Vision Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States; Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, United States.
Nathan P HesemannOne-Health One-Medicine Ophthalmology and Vision Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States; Mason Eye Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Shyam S ChaurasiaOne-Health One-Medicine Ophthalmology and Vision Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States; Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, United States.
Rajiv R MohanOne-Health One-Medicine Ophthalmology and Vision Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States; Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, United States; Mason Eye Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States. Electronic address: mohanr@health.missouri.edu.
University of Missouri Health System · USUniversity of Missouri · USHarry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital · USCincinnati Eye Institute · US

Funding

Gene Therapy in the CorneaR01EY017294 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI MOHAN, RAJIV RAVINDRA · 2007 to 2018
$4.3M
Turbo Eye Drops to Treat Ocular Toxicity and Blindness from Sulfur MustardU01EY031650 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI MOHAN, RAJIV RAVINDRA · 2020 to 2024
$3.7M
Novel approaches for corneal haze/fibrosis eliminationR01EY030774 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI MOHAN, RAJIV RAVINDRA · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
Targeted Gene Therapy and Nanomedicine Approaches to Treat Corneal DiseasesI01BX000357 · VA · HARRY S. TRUMAN MEMORIAL VA HOSPITAL · PI Rajiv Ravindra Mohan · 2009 to 2026
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000357BLRD VA IK6 BX005646NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017294NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030774NEI NIH HHS U01 EY031650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing differs significantly between men and women in a tissue-dependent manner. Dermal wounds heal faster in women whereas mucosal wounds heal faster in men. However, the effect of sex as a variable in corneal wound healing is largely unknown. The primary objective of this study was to test whether sex is a biological variable in corneal wound healing activated by the trauma or injury using an established in vivo rabbit model with male and female New Zealand White rabbits. Corneal wounds in rabbits were produced by a single topical alkali (0.5N Sodium hydroxide) application. Serial slit-lamp, stereo biomicroscopy, and applanation tonometry evaluated corneal opacity, anterior segment ocular health, and intraocular pressure (IOP), respectively, at various times during the study. Fourteen days after alkali-wound, corneal tissues were collected after humane euthanasia to examine cellular and molecular wound healing parameters. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and immunofluorescence were used to quantify changes in the extracellular modeling protein levels of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), Fibronectin (FN), Collagen-I (Col-I), and Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1) involved in corneal healing. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining was used to study histopathological changes in morphology and TUNEL assay to evaluate levels of apoptotic cell death. Male and female rabbits showed no significant differences in corneal opacity (Fantes score) or intraocular pressure (IOP) values (9.5 ± 0.5 mm Hg) in live animals. Likewise, no statistically significant sex-based differences in the mRNA levels of α-SMA (male = 5.95 ± 0.21 fold vs. female = 5.32 ± 0.043), FN (male = 3.02 ± 0.24 fold vs. female = 3.23 ± 0.27), Col-I (male = 3.12 ± 0.37 fold vs. female = 3.31 ± 0.24), TGFβ1 (male = 1.65 ± 0.06 fold vs. female = 1.59 ± 0.053); and protein levels of α-SMA (male = 74.16 ± 4.6 vs. female = 71.58 ± 7.1), FN (male = 60.11 ± 4.6 vs. female = 57.41 ± 8.3), Col-I (male = 84.11 ± 2.8 vs. female = 84.55 ± 3.6), TGFβ1 (male = 11.61 ± 2.8 vs. female = 9.5 ± 3.04) were observed. Furthermore, H&E and TUNEL analyses found no statistically significant differences in cellular structures and apoptosis, respectively, in male vs. female corneas. Consistent with earlier reports, wounded corneas showed significantly increased levels of these parameters compared to the unwounded corneas. Our data suggest that sex is not a major biological variable during active early stages of corneal wound healing in rabbits in vivo.

Indexed as

Sex FactorsActinsAnimalsBurns, ChemicalCollagen Type ICorneal InjuriesEye BurnsFemaleFibronectinsFluorescent Antibody TechniqueIn Situ Nick-End LabelingMaleRabbitsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerSodium HydroxideActinsCollagen Type IFibronectinsRNA, MessengerSodium HydroxideTransforming Growth Factor beta1CorneaFibrosisMale vs. femaleSex variableWound healing

Identifiers

PMID31226339
PMCPMC9250696
OpenAlexW2950756087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.