Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31226113›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Genetic and antigenic variation of foot-and-mouth disease virus during persistent infection in naturally infected cattle and Asian buffalo in India.

Jitendra K Biswal, Rajeev Ranjan, Saravanan Subramaniam, Jajati K Mohapatra, Sanjay Patidar, Mukesh K Sharma, Miranda R Bertram, Barbara Brito, Luis L Rodriguez, Bramhadev Pattnaik and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Molecular characterization ofVeterinary world · 2024
    Article
  3. Viral Diseases in Water Buffalo (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jitendra K BiswalICAR-Directorate of Foot and Mouth Disease, Mukteshwar, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India.
Rajeev RanjanICAR-Directorate of Foot and Mouth Disease, Mukteshwar, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India.
Saravanan SubramaniamICAR-Directorate of Foot and Mouth Disease, Mukteshwar, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India.
Jajati K MohapatraICAR-Directorate of Foot and Mouth Disease, Mukteshwar, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India.
Sanjay PatidarABIS Dairy, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, India.
Mukesh K SharmaABIS Dairy, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, India.
Miranda R BertramForeign Animal Disease Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY, United States of America.
Barbara BritoForeign Animal Disease Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY, United States of America.
Luis L RodriguezForeign Animal Disease Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY, United States of America.
Bramhadev PattnaikICAR-Directorate of Foot and Mouth Disease, Mukteshwar, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India.
Jonathan ArztForeign Animal Disease Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7517-7893
Project Directorate on Foot and Mouth Disease · INOak Ridge Associated Universities · USPlum Island Animal Disease Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) persistently infected ruminants in initiating new outbreaks remains controversial, and the perceived threat posed by such animals hinders international trade in FMD-endemic countries. In this study we report longitudinal analyses of genetic and antigenic variations of FMDV serotype O/ME-SA/Ind2001d sublineage during naturally occurring, persistent infection in cattle and buffalo at an organised dairy farm in India. The proportion of animals from which FMDV RNA was recovered was not significantly different between convalescent (post-clinical) and sub-clinically infected animals or between cattle and buffalo across the sampling period. However, infectious virus was isolated from a higher proportion of buffalo samples and for a longer duration compared to cattle. Analysis of the P1 sequences from recovered viruses indicated fixation of mutations at the rate of 1.816 x 10-2substitution/site/year (s/s/y) (95% CI 1.362-2.31 x 10-2 s/s/y). However, the majority of point mutations were transitional substitutions. Within individual animals, the mean dN/dS (ω) value for the P1 region varied from 0.076 to 0.357, suggesting the selection pressure acting on viral genomes differed substantially across individual animals. Statistical parsimony analysis indicated that all of the virus isolates from carrier animals originated from the outbreak virus. The antigenic relationship value as determined by 2D-VNT assay revealed fluctuation of antigenic variants within and between carrier animals during the carrier state which suggested that some carrier viruses had diverged substantially from the protection provided by the vaccine strain. This study contributes to understanding the extent of within-host and within-herd evolution that occurs during the carrier state of FMDV.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigenic VariationAntigens, ViralBuffaloesCattleCattle DiseasesFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseLongitudinal StudiesPoint MutationRNA, ViralAntigens, ViralRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID31226113
PMCPMC6588224
OpenAlexW2949887886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.