Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31225956›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2019

Not Above the Law: A Legal and Ethical Analysis of Short-Term Experiences in Global Health.

Virginia Rowthorn, Lawrence Loh, Jessica Evert, Eleanor Chung, Judith Lasker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Virtual global health in graduate medical education: a systematic review.International journal of medical education · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cultural Sensitivity and Ethical Considerations.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Virginia RowthornUniversity of Maryland Baltimore, US.
Lawrence LohUniversity of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, CA.
Jessica EvertDepartment of Family and Community Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, US.
Eleanor ChungMaryland Court of Special Appeals, Clerkship Program, US.
Judith LaskerDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Lehigh University, US.
Lehigh University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons from high-income countries have multiple opportunities today to participate in "short-term experiences in global health" (STEGHs) in low-resourced countries. STEGHs are organized through religious missions, service learning, medical internships, global health education, and international electives. An issue of increasing concern in STEGHs is "hands-on" participation in clinical procedures by volunteers and students with limited or no medical training. To address these concerns, best practices and ethical standards have been developed. However, not all STEGH organizations adhere to these guidelines, and some actively or tacitly allow unethical and potentially illegal practices.

objectivesThis paper considers the legal framework within which STEGHs operate. It assesses whether certain STEGH practices break laws in the US and/or host countries or violate international "soft" legal norms. Two activities of particular concern are: practicing medicine without a license and drug importation and distribution.

conclusionsMany activities undertaken in STEGHs would be illegal if they took place on US soil. In addition, these same activities are often illegal in the host countries where STEGHs operate, although compliance is unevenly enforced. Many STEGH activities violate World Health Organization guidelines for ethical conduct in humanitarian activities. RECOMMENDATIONS: This paper encourages STEGH organizations to end unethical and potentially illegal activities; urges regulatory and non-regulatory stakeholders to alter policies that motivate participation in illegal or unethical STEGH activities; and encourages host countries to enforce their local and national health laws.

Indexed as

Ethical AnalysisDeveloping CountriesGlobal HealthHumansMedical MissionsVolunteers

Identifiers

PMID31225956
PMCPMC6634331
OpenAlexW2952239931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.