ArticleActa orthopaedica2019
No effect of delivery on total hip replacement survival: a nationwide register study in Finland.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the Effects and Challenges of Total Hip Arthroplasty before Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Review
- Caesarean Section for Orthopedic Indications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Postoperative survival of extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after surgery: a population-based cohort.BMJ open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose - Previous small studies have suggested that delivery does not adversely affect the survivorship of total hip replacement (THR). We investigated whether delivery after primary THR affects hip implant survivorship in a large population-based study sample Patients and methods - In this register-based nationwide cohort study, all women aged 15-45 who underwent primary THR in Finland from 1987 to 2007 were included from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Data on deliveries were obtained from the medical birth register. After primary THR, 111 women (133 THRs) delivered and formed the delivery group. In the reference group, 1,878 women (2,343 THRs) had no deliveries. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to study implant survivorship at 6 and 13 years, and Cox multiple regression to assess survival and hazard ratios (HRs), with revision for any reason as an endpoint with adjustment for age, rheumatoid arthritis, and stem and cup fixation. Results - 51 (38%) revisions were recorded in the delivery group and 645 (28%) revisions in the reference group. The 6-year implant survivorship was 91% (CI 85-96) in the delivery group and 88% (CI 87-90) in the reference group. The 13-year survival rates were 50% (CI 39-62) and 61% (CI 59-64). The adjusted HR for revision after delivery was 0.7 (CI 0.4-1.2) in ≤ 6.8 years' follow-up and 1.1 (CI 0.8-1.6) in > 6.8 years' follow-up. Interpretation - Based on the findings in this nationwide study of hip replacement in fertile-aged women, delivery does not seem to decrease THR implant survivorship; women should not be afraid of or avoid becoming pregnant after THR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.