Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31225625›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2020

Potential Moderating Effects of Sex/Gender on the Acute Relative Reinforcing and Subjective Effects of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Vulnerable Populations.

Joanna M Streck, Danielle R Davis, Raina D Pang, Stacey C Sigmon, Janice Y Bunn, Cecilia L Bergeria, Jennifer W Tidey, Sarah H Heil, Diann E Gaalema, John R Hughes and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advancing Our Understanding of Tobacco Use in Vulnerable Populations.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna M StreckVermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT.
Danielle R DavisVermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT.
Raina D PangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Stacey C SigmonVermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT.
Janice Y BunnVermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT.
Cecilia L BergeriaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jennifer W TideyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Sarah H HeilVermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT.
Diann E GaalemaVermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT.
John R HughesVermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT.
Maxine L StitzerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Ellaina ReedVermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT.
Stephen T HigginsVermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, University of Vermont,Burlington, VT.
University of Vermont · USJohns Hopkins University · USBrown University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

VERY LOW NICOTINE CIGARETTES IN SMOKERS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIAU54DA031659 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LE, CHAP T. · 2011 to 2022
$64.7M
Vermont Center on Behavior and HealthP20GM103644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI SIGMON, STACEY C · 2013 to 2022
$21.3M
University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceU54DA036114 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2018 to 2022
$19.4M
Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory ScienceP50DA036114 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2013 to 2017
$19.1M
TRAINING IN BEHAV. PHARMACOLOGY OF HUMAN DRUG DEPENDENCET32DA007242 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HEIL, SARAH H, HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 1990 to 2025
$8.2M
Substance Abuse Intervention/Outcome Research TrainingT32DA016184 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Damaris J. Rohsenow, JENNIFER W. TIDEY · 2003 to 2026
$6.1M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036114NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007242NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016184NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA031659NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036114NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReports in relatively healthy smokers suggest men are more sensitive than women to the subjective effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes (RNCCs). We know of no reports examining sex differences in the relative reinforcing effects of RNCCs, an important outcome in assessing smoking's addiction potential. The aim of the present study is to address this gap by examining sex/gender differences on reinforcing effects while examining whether sex differences in subjective effects are discernible in vulnerable populations.

methodsSecondary analysis of a within-subject, double-blinded experiment examining acute effects of cigarettes varying in nicotine content (0.4, 2.4, 5.2, 15.8 mg/g) among 169 adult smokers with psychiatric conditions or socioeconomic disadvantage. Effects of dose, sex, and their interaction were examined on reinforcing (concurrent-choice and Cigarette Purchase Task [CPT] testing), and subjective effects (Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire [CEQ] and craving/withdrawal ratings).

resultsReducing nicotine content decreased the relative reinforcing effects of smoking in concurrent-choice and CPT testing (p's < .05) with no significant effects of sex nor dose × sex/gender interactions. Reducing nicotine content decreased CEQ ratings with only a single significant effect of sex (higher Psychological Reward scores among women than men, p = .02) and no significant dose × sex/gender interactions. Results on craving/withdrawal paralleled those on the CEQ.

conclusionsReducing nicotine content decreases the addiction potential of smoking independent of sex in populations highly vulnerable to smoking and addiction, with no indication that women are less sensitive to subjective effects of RNCCs or would benefit less from a policy reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes. IMPLICATIONS: A policy reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes has the potential to reduce the addiction potential of smoking across men and women who are especially vulnerable to smoking, addiction, and tobacco-related adverse health impacts.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdultBehavior, AddictiveFemaleHumansMaleNicotineRewardSex FactorsSmokersSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsTobacco SmokingUnited StatesVulnerable PopulationsNicotine

Identifiers

PMID31225625
PMCPMC7395666
OpenAlexW2951950167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.