Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31225419›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2019

Clinical significance of preoperative nutritional parameter and patient outcomes after pancreatectomy: A retrospective study at two academic institute.

Atsushi Nanashima, Masahide Hiyoshi, Naoya Imamura, Koichi Yano, Takeomi Hamada, Rouko Hamada, Kenzo Nagatomo, Makoto Ikenoue, Shuichi Tobinaga, Takeshi Nagayasu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Atsushi NanashimaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Masahide HiyoshiDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Naoya ImamuraDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Koichi YanoDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Takeomi HamadaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Rouko HamadaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Kenzo NagatomoDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Makoto IkenoueDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreas Surgery, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan.
Shuichi TobinagaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Takeshi NagayasuDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/

aimsPreoperative nutritional status has been reported to influence patient outcomes after pancreatectomy. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) is a useful parameter to reflect the outcomes of patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Therefore, the relationship between the PNI and clinicopathological factors, surgical data, and postoperative morbidity were retrospectively evaluated at two academic institutes in a cohort study.

methodsCurative pancreatectomy was performed on 222 patients at the University of Nagasaki between 1995 and March 2015, and 101 at the University of Miyazaki between April 2015and March 2018. The PNI was calculated using preoperative albumin and total cholesterol levels.

resultsThe mean PNI in our series was 39.2±5.4 and the prevalence of PNIs less than 40 was observed in 134 patients (44%). The PNI was not significantly different between normal, hard, and fatty architecture of the pancreatic parenchyma. The PNIs were significantly negatively correlated with higher age (

conclusionsAlthough the preoperative PNIs reflect the perioperative nutritional status, its predictive usefulness for postoperative complications could not be significantly confirmed.

Indexed as

PancreatectomyPostoperative complicationsPostoperative nutritional parametersPrognostic nutritional index

Identifiers

PMID31225419
PMCPMC6558137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.