ArticleGlobal health research and policy2019
The potential impact of a "curative intervention" for HIV: a modelling study.
Article in Global health research and policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards inclusive HIV cure development: Identifying important and acceptable HIV cure attributes and strategies among people with HIV in the Netherlands.HIV medicine · 2026Article
- Model-based evaluation of the impact of a potential HIV cure on HIV transmission dynamics.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Meeting Summary for Keystone Symposia on HIV Cure: Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)-Free Control of HIV Infection in Durban, South Africa, 2025.Pathogens & immunity · 2025Article
- Anti-PD-1 chimeric antigen receptor T cells efficiently target SIV-infected CD4+ T cells in germinal centers.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Article
- Prevention, treatment and cure of HIV infection.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023Review
- The long-term impact and value of curative therapy for HIV: a modelling analysis.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2023Article
- Recent advances in CD8Heliyon · 2023Review
- Progress Note 2024: Curing HIV; Not in My Lifetime or Just Around the Corner?Pathogens & immunity · 2023Article
- Ethics of HIV cure research: an unfinished agenda.BMC medical ethics · 2021Review
- Psychosocial characteristics and HIV-related sexual behaviors among cisgender, transgender, and gender non-conforming MSM in China.BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
- Can Broadly Neutralizing HIV-1 Antibodies Help Achieve an ART-Free Remission?Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- The case for an HIV cure and how to get there.The lancet. HIV · 2021Review
- Bringing Gene Therapies for HIV Disease to Resource-Limited Parts of the World.Human gene therapy · 2021Article
- Highlights of the 9th edition of the Conference on HIV Persistence During Therapy, 10-13 December 2019, Miami, USA.Journal of virus eradication · 2020Article
- Correction to: The potential impact of a "curative intervention" for HIV: a modelling study.Global health research and policy · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEfforts to develop an HIV "cure" (i.e., an intervention leading to durable ART-free remission or eradication of HIV infection) have become better resourced and coordinated in recent years. Given, however, the availability of other interventions for prevention and treatment of HIV disease, it is unclear whether, to what extent, and under which circumstances a curative intervention would have an impact in ending the AIDS epidemic and which characteristics of its implementation would be most important. We designed a range of analyses to investigate these unknowns.
methodsWe used a deterministic, compartmental model of HIV infection in South Africa to estimate the impact of a curative intervention. We first examined how its impact would be affected by the state of the epidemic at the time that it is introduced, by the timing and pace of scale-up, and by various targeting strategies. We then investigated the impact of a curative intervention relative to its ability to maintain viral suppression.
findingsTo the extent that other interventions have failed to control the epidemic, i.e., if incidence and AIDS deaths remain high, a curative intervention would result in a larger reduction in incidence. Earlier and faster scale-up allows for greater impact. We also found that a curative intervention would more efficiently reduce transmission if it is prioritised to those not able to obtain or remain on ART and to those aged 15-25 rather than older persons. On the other hand, an intervention that does not maintain viral suppression if the individual is exposed to re-infection could lead to an increase in HIV incidence.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that a curative intervention for HIV would have the greatest impact if the epidemic is not under control by 2030, particularly if the intervention is targeted to those who are more likely to transmit virus, and if it maintained durable viral suppression, even upon exposure to re-infection. These considerations underscore the need to carefully consider the "target product profiles" for an HIV cure in the context of how and where it would be used, and suggest that such profiles may require revision as the epidemic evolves in the coming years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.