Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31223520›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Investigation of the protein profile of silkworm (

Cristina Lamberti, Francesco Gai, Simona Cirrincione, Marzia Giribaldi, Micol Purrotti, Marcello Manfredi, Emilio Marengo, Benedetto Sicuro, Alessio Saviane, Silvia Cappellozza and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cristina LambertiInstitute of Science of Food Production, National Research Council, Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2052-5229
Francesco GaiInstitute of Science of Food Production, National Research Council, Grugliasco, Italy.
Simona CirrincioneInstitute of Science of Food Production, National Research Council, Grugliasco, Italy.
Marzia GiribaldiResearch Centre for Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Economics, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3507-7684
Micol PurrottiInstitute of Science of Food Production, National Research Council, Grugliasco, Italy.
Marcello ManfrediCenter for Translational Research on Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases (CAAD), Novara, Italy.
Emilio MarengoCenter for Translational Research on Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases (CAAD), Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-7375
Benedetto SicuroDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Alessio SavianeCentre of Research for Agriculture and Environment, Sericulture Laboratory, Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Economics, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-5688
Silvia CappellozzaCentre of Research for Agriculture and Environment, Sericulture Laboratory, Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Economics, Padova, Italy.
Maria Gabriella GiuffridaInstitute of Science of Food Production, National Research Council, Grugliasco, Italy.
Laura CavallarinInstitute of Science of Food Production, National Research Council, Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-1683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSilkworm pupae is the main by-product of the sericulture industry with an interesting nutritional profile, especially in terms of proteins. In consideration of its possible use as a food or food ingredient in Western countries, a comparative proteomic experiment has been performed to investigate the differences of the protein profile of male and female silkworm pupae reared on mulberry leaves or on an artificial diet.

methodsThe nutritional profile of lyophilized silkworm pupae in terms of dry matter and ash was evaluated according to the AOAC procedures, the total nitrogen content was determined by a nitrogen analyzer and the silkworm pupae gross energy value was measured using an adiabatic calorimetric bomb. The comparative proteomic analysis was performed on male and female silkworm pupae reared on mulberry leaves or on the artificial diet. Proteins were separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis and, after a multivariate statistical analysis, the differentially expressed proteins were identified by LC-MS/MS.

resultsThe comparative proteomic approach highlighted 47 silkworm pupae proteins differentially expressed comparing diet and gender. PCA analysis showed that seven proteins were more effective in discriminating the sex and five were more effective in discriminating the diet type. In spite of the above-mentioned differences in the silkworm pupae protein profile, no strong alteration of the pupa physiological traits have been demonstrated, suggesting a general silkworm pupae flexibility to adapt to a well-balanced artificial diet. Differences in lipid transport and metabolism were found among the experimental groups, that might have a relevant effect on the timing and on hormone secretion. This aspect may also affect silk production, as univoltine strains are the most productive. The proteomic data provided in this work, may offer a contribution in understanding also the influence of gender and farming strategy on the allergen profile of

Indexed as

Artificial dietFarmingInsectMass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID31223520
PMCPMC6571003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.