Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31223518›Full record

ArticleGlobal advances in health and medicine2019

Nonpharmacological Self-Management of Migraine Across Social Locations: An Equity-Oriented, Qualitative Analysis.

Deanna R Befus, Sharon Hull, Justine Strand de Oliveira, Gillian Sanders Schmidler, Morris Weinberger, Remy R Coeytaux

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global advances in health and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06229834 (Chiropractic Care for Episodic Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06229834 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Chiropractic Care for Episodic Migraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsEpisodic MigraineArmsChiropractic Care, Headache Health Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multimodal chiropractic care for migraine: A pilot randomized controlled trial.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2021
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Deanna R BefusArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University Faculty of Health Sciences, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3714-7885
Sharon HullDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Justine Strand de OliveiraDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Gillian Sanders SchmidlerDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Morris WeinbergerGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Remy R CoeytauxDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1542-9016
Duke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWake Forest University · USWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine is a disabling neurological disorder and the sixth biggest cause of disability worldwide. The World Health Organization has declared migraine a major public health problem due to a paucity of knowledge about cause and effective treatment options. Both in incidence and severity, migraine disproportionately affects people occupying marginalized social locations (SL). Managed pharmacologically, migraine is treated with daily preventive and as-needed abortive medications. Both come with high literal and figurative costs: intolerable side effects, medication interactions, and prohibitive prices. Cost prohibitive, ineffective, and unsustainable pharmacological treatment options have contributed to high levels of interest in complementary approaches by people with migraine, but little is known about their motivations, patterns of use or access, or how these may vary by SL.

methodWe conducted focus groups with 30 people with migraine to explore their desires and recommendations for migraine clinicians and researchers. We used qualitative content analysis to identify themes.Outcomes: We identified 4 themes: a more holistic, collaborative, long-term treatment approach; medication as a short-term solution; high personal and economic costs of medication; and desire for more information and access to natural approaches. Across SL, participants expressed keen interest in integrative approaches and wanted better access to complementary modalities. Participants in marginalized SL described reliance on traditional/folk remedies, including engagement with family and community healers, who they described as more affordable and culturally accessible.

conclusionsHolistic and integrative approaches were preferred over medication as long-term migraine management strategies. However, people in marginalized SL, while disproportionately disabled by migraine, did not feel as comfortable accessing integrative approaches through currently available channels. Engaging with these communities and using a critical lens to explore barriers to access can develop options to make complementary modalities more approachable, while also attending to systemic blind spots that may unintentionally alienate socially marginalized groups.

Indexed as

complementary and alternative medicinehealth equityintegrative medicinemigraineself-managementsocial location

Identifiers

PMID31223518
PMCPMC6566474
OpenAlexW2951164064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.