Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31223511›Full record

ArticleCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology2019

Giant Vulvar Condylomata: Two Cases and a Review of the Literature.

Funda Gungor Ugurlucan, Cenk Yasa, Omer Demir, Ozlem Dural, Ekrem Yavuz, Suleyman Engin Akhan

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funda Gungor UgurlucanIstanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4579-7087
Cenk YasaIstanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkey.
Omer DemirIstanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4376-8733
Ozlem DuralIstanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkey.
Ekrem YavuzIstanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Turkey.
Suleyman Engin AkhanIstanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGiant vulvar condyloma is usually associated with the HPV subtypes 6 and 11 and is characterized by excessive growth of verrucous lesions on the genitals and/or perianal region. It may be observed in sexually inactive as well as sexually active women. Immunosuppression plays an important role in the development of the disease. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe report two cases of giant vulvar condyloma together with the review of the literature.

resultsOne case was a 21-year old sexually inactive woman with a history of Type 1 Diabetes. Second case was a 20-year-old sexually active woman with a rapidly progressing disease and cervical dysplasia. Both cases were operated; all the condylomatous structures were resected with preservation of the anatomy and clitoral innervation and blood flow. Skin and subcuticular dehiscence was the only complication encountered in the first case.

conclusionMain treatment of giant vulvar condyloma is surgical resection with maintenance of the vulvar anatomy. Preservation of especially the clitoral innervation as much as possible is very important.

Identifiers

PMID31223511
PMCPMC6541941
OpenAlexW2945997578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.