Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31223462›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2019

Do Zebrafish Obey Lipinski Rules?

Keith Long, Stephen J Kostman, Christian Fernandez, James C Burnett, Donna M Huryn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keith LongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States.
Stephen J KostmanOhio Wesleyan University, Delaware, Ohio 43015, United States.
Christian FernandezDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States.
James C BurnettDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States.
Donna M HurynDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States.

Funding

Improving the disposition of antileukemic asparaginase after drug-induced immunotoxicityR01CA216815 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FERNANDEZ, CHRISTIAN ANTONIO · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of zebrafish in whole organism phenotypic assays has become a valuable strategy throughout the drug discovery process. Zebrafish assays can be used not only to screen libraries of compounds at the earliest stages but also to evaluate advanced leads for their effects on specific biological pathways or for toxicity. However, when confronted with inactivity of a compound in a zebrafish assay, there are little data that can be used to judge if the compound is truly biologically inert or inactive due to a lack of permeability into the model organism. While medicinal chemistry principles suggest parameters that are predictive of human oral bioavailability, cellular permeability, and even bacterial permeability, there have been no such parameters developed for zebrafish absorption. To address this question, we compiled a set of 700 compounds reported in the literature to be active in zebrafish assays, evaluated their properties, and compared them to properties derived from a set of historical drugs and a set of recently approved oral drugs. While some properties overlap, the averages and 10th and 90th percentiles of molecular weight, octanol-water partition coefficient (logP), H-bond counts, and polar surface area for zebrafish-active compounds are statistically different from those of known drugs. This analysis should be useful to scientists interpreting structure-activity relationships based on data from zebrafish assays and help to inform the translation from fish to mammals.

Identifiers

PMID31223462
PMCPMC6580538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.