Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31223259›Full record

ArticleBiochemia medica2019

European survey on preanalytical sample handling - Part 2: Practices of European laboratories on monitoring and processing haemolytic, icteric and lipemic samples. On behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE).

Janne Cadamuro, Giuseppe Lippi, Alexander von Meyer, Mercedes Ibarz, Edmee van Dongen, Lases5, Michael Cornes, Mads Nybo, Pieter Vermeersch, Kjell Grankvist and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemia medica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Charting the Next Road Map for CSF Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Handling of lipemic samples in the clinical laboratory.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Janne CadamuroDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Giuseppe LippiSection of Clinical Chemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alexander von MeyerInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Kliniken Nordoberpfalz AG and Klinikum St. Marien, Weiden and Amberg, Germany.
Mercedes IbarzDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.
Edmee van DongenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Lases5
Michael CornesClinical Chemistry Department, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK.
Mads NyboDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Pieter VermeerschClinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kjell GrankvistDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Clinical Chemistry, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.
Joao Tiago GuimaraesDepartment of Clinical Pathology, São João Hospital Center, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, and EPI Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Gunn B B KristensenNorwegian Quality Improvement of laboratory examinations (Noklus), Bergen, Norway.
Barbara de la SalleUK NEQAS Haematology, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, operating UK NEQAS for Haematology and Transfusion, Watford, UK.
Ana-Maria SimundicDepartment of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNo guideline currently exists on how to detect or document haemolysis, icterus or lipemia (HIL) in blood samples, nor on subsequent use of this information. The EFLM WG-PRE has performed a survey for assessing current practices of European laboratories in HIL monitoring. This second part of two coherent articles is focused on HIL. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn online survey, containing 39 questions on preanalytical issues, was disseminated among EFLM member countries. Seventeen questions exclusively focused on assessment, management and follow-up actions of HIL in routine blood samples.

resultsOverall, 1405 valid responses from 37 countries were received. A total of 1160 (86%) of all responders stating to analyse blood samples - monitored HIL. HIL was mostly checked in clinical chemistry samples and less frequently in those received for coagulation, therapeutic drug monitoring and serology/infectious disease testing. HIL detection by automatic HIL indices or visual inspection, along with haemolysis cut-offs definition, varied widely among responders. A quarter of responders performing automated HIL checks used internal quality controls. In haemolytic/icteric/lipemic samples, most responders (70%) only rejected HIL-sensitive parameters, whilst about 20% released all test results with general comments. Other responders did not analysed but rejected the entire sample, while some released all tests, without comments. Overall, 26% responders who monitored HIL were using this information for monitoring phlebotomy or sample transport quality.

conclusionStrategies for monitoring and treating haemolytic, icteric or lipemic samples are quite heterogeneous in Europe. The WG-PRE will use these insights for developing and providing recommendations aimed at harmonizing strategies across Europe.

Indexed as

Clinical MedicineHemolysisPre-Analytical PhaseSurveys and QuestionnairesChemistry, ClinicalClinical Laboratory TechniquesEuropeHumansHyperlipidemiasJaundicepreanalyticsstandardizationsurvey

Identifiers

PMID31223259
PMCPMC6559623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.