Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31223232›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary bioinformatics online2019

The Estimated Pacemaker for Great Apes Supports the Hominoid Slowdown Hypothesis.

Beatriz Mello, Carlos G Schrago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary bioinformatics online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Beatriz MelloDepartment of Genetics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-2757
Carlos G SchragoDepartment of Genetics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent surge of genomic data has prompted the investigation of substitution rate variation across the genome, as well as among lineages. Evolutionary trees inferred from distinct genomic regions may display branch lengths that differ between loci by simple proportionality constants, indicating that rate variation follows a pacemaker model, which may be attributed to lineage effects. Analyses of genes from diverse biological clades produced contrasting results, supporting either this model or alternative scenarios where multiple pacemakers exist. So far, an evaluation of the pacemaker hypothesis for all great apes has never been carried out. In this work, we tested whether the evolutionary rates of hominids conform to pacemakers, which were inferred accounting for gene tree/species tree discordance. For higher precision, substitution rates in branches were estimated with a calibration-free approach, the relative rate framework. A predominant evolutionary trend in great apes was evidenced by the recovery of a large pacemaker, encompassing most hominid genomic regions. In addition, the majority of genes followed a pace of evolution that was closely related to the strict molecular clock. However, slight rate decreases were recovered in the internal branches leading to humans, corroborating the hominoid slowdown hypothesis. Our findings suggest that in great apes, life history traits were the major drivers of substitution rate variation across the genome.

Indexed as

evolutionary ratesgenome evolutionmolecular dating

Identifiers

PMID31223232
PMCPMC6566470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.