Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31223223›Full record

ArticleStructural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal2018

Recovering Predictor-Criterion Relations Using Covariate-Informed Factor Score Estimates.

Patrick J Curran, Veronica T Cole, Daniel J Bauer, W Andrew Rothenberg, Andrea M Hussong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Causally Interpretable Meta-analysis: Application in Adolescent HIV Prevention.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Factor Scores in Small Samples: Recommendations and Solutions.Educational and psychological measurement · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A primer on intensive longitudinal psychometrics.Behavior research methods · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Informing Harmonization Decisions in Integrative Data Analysis: Exploring the Measurement Multiverse.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Utilizing Moderated Non-linear Factor Analysis Models for Integrative Data Analysis: A Tutorial.Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrick J CurranUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Veronica T ColeUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Daniel J BauerUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
W Andrew RothenbergUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Andrea M HussongUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

Harmonizing substance use and disorder measures to facilitate multistudy analysesR01DA034636 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BAUER, DANIEL J · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is currently best-practice to directly model latent factors whenever feasible, there remain many situations in which this approach is not tractable. Recent advances in covariate-informed factor score estimation can be used to provide manifest scores that are used in second-stage analysis, but these are currently understudied. Here we extend our prior work on factor score recovery to examine the use of factor score estimates as predictors both in the presence and absence of the same covariates that were used in score estimation. Results show that whereas the relation between the factor score estimates and the criterion are typically well recovered, substantial bias and increased variability is evident in the covariate effects themselves. Importantly, using covariate-informed factor score estimates substantially, and often wholly, mitigates these biases. We conclude with implications for future research and recommendations for the use of factor score estimates in practice.

Indexed as

Factor score estimationintegrative data analysisitem response theorymoderated nonlinear factor analysis

Identifiers

PMID31223223
PMCPMC6586237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.