ArticleJournal of membrane science2019
DNA RETENTION ON DEPTH FILTERS.
Article in Journal of membrane science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alluvial filtration as a scalable and safe single-use technology for the harvest of viral vectors.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Multiple Use of Regenerated Depth Filters in Antibody Purification Processes.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Article
- Behavior of host-cell-protein-rich aggregates in antibody capture and polishing chromatography.Journal of chromatography. A · 2023Article
- Role of harvest depth filtration in controlling product-related impurities for a bispecific antibody.Antibody therapeutics · 2022Article
- Analysis of fouling and breakthrough of process related impurities during depth filtration using confocal microscopy.Biotechnology progress · 2022Article
- Wide-surface pore microfiltration membrane drastically improves sieving decay in TFF-based perfusion cell culture and streamline chromatography integration for continuous bioprocessing.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2020Article
- Automation of an integrated micro-scale platform for monoclonal antibody process development by incorporation of a depth filter mimic.Biotechnology progressArticle
- Depth filter material process interaction in the harvest of mammalian cells.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Depth filtration is a commonly-used bioprocessing unit operation for harvest clarification that reduces the levels of process- and product-related impurities such as cell debris, host-cell proteins, nucleic acids and protein aggregates. Since depth filters comprise multiple components, different functionalities may contribute to such retention, making the mechanisms by which different impurities are removed difficult to decouple. Here we probe the mechanisms by which double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is retained on depth filter media by visualizing the distribution of fluorescently-labeled retained DNA on spent depth filter discs using confocal fluorescence microscopy. The extent of DNA displacement into the depth filter was found to increase with decreasing DNA length with increasing operational parameters such as wash volume and buffer ionic strength. Finally, using 5ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) to label DNA in dividing CHO cells, we showed that Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cellular DNA in the lysate supernatant migrates deeper into the depth filter than the lysate re-suspended pellet, elucidating the role of the size of the DNA in its form as an impurity. Apart from aiding DNA purification and removal, our experimental approaches and findings can be leveraged in studying the transport and retention of nucleic acids and other impurities on depth filters at a small scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.