ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019
The Potential of Blockchain Technology for Health Information Exchange: Experimental Study From Patients' Perspectives.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Biomedical blockchain with practical implementations and quantitative evaluations: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Pooled it
- Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Exploring applications of blockchain in healthcare: road map and future directions.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Measuring the willingness to share personal health information: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Transforming Health Data to Actionable Information: Recent Progress and Future Opportunities in Health Information Exchange.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2022Pooled it
- Applications of Blockchain in the Medical Field: Narrative Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- The Current State of Research, Challenges, and Future Research Directions of Blockchain Technology in Patient Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- An integrated framework of TOE, RBV, and institutional theory for understanding blockchain adoption in Egyptian public hospitals.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Resistance to Blockchain Adoption in Health Care Organizations: Evidence From a Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Acceptance of Smart Contracts in Patients Receiving Primary Care: Exploratory Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Patient Perceptions of Blockchain-Based Health Information Exchange: User-Centered Design Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Blockchain technology adoption in healthcare: an integrated model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Blockchain as a Prime Guardian: Securing Clinical Trial Data Integrity.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2025Review
- Effective Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies for Empowerment of Drug Discovery and Development.Current drug discovery technologies · 2025Review
- Data driven healthcare insurance system using machine learning and blockchain technologies.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Privacy-Enhancing Technologies in Biomedical Data Science.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2024Review
- Searchable Blockchain-Based Healthcare Information Exchange System to Enhance Privacy Preserving and Data Usability.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Identifying the Barriers to Acceptance of Blockchain-Based Patient-Centric Data Management Systems in Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical Impact of "Real World Data" and Blockchain on Public Health: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Role of Incentives in the Use of Blockchain-Based Platforms for Sharing Sensitive Health Data: Experimental Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNowadays, a number of mechanisms and tools are being used by health care organizations and physicians to electronically exchange the personal health information of patients. The main objectives of different methods of health information exchange (HIE) are to reduce health care costs, minimize medical errors, and improve the coordination of interorganizational information exchange across health care entities. The main challenges associated with the common HIE systems are privacy concerns, security risks, low visibility of system transparency, and lack of patient control. Blockchain technology is likely to disrupt the current information exchange models utilized in the health care industry.
objectiveLittle is known about patients' perceptions and attitudes toward the implementation of blockchain-enabled HIE networks, and it is still not clear if patients (as one of the main HIE stakeholders) are likely to opt in to the applications of this technology in HIE initiatives. Thus, this study aimed at exploring the core value of blockchain technology in the health care industry from health care consumers' views.
methodsTo recognize the potential applications of blockchain technology in health care practices, we designed 16 information exchange scenarios for controlled Web-based experiments. Overall, 2013 respondents participated in 16 Web-based experiments. Each experiment described an information exchange condition characterized by 4 exchange mechanisms (ie, direct, lookup, patient-centered, and blockchain), 2 types of health information (ie, sensitive vs nonsensitive), and 2 types of privacy policy (weak vs strong).
resultsThe findings show that there are significant differences in patients' perceptions of various exchange mechanisms with regard to patient privacy concern, trust in competency and integrity, opt-in intention, and willingness to share information. Interestingly, participants hold a favorable attitude toward the implementation of blockchain-based exchange mechanisms for privacy protection, coordination, and information exchange purposes. This study proposed the potentials and limitations of a blockchain-based attempt in the HIE context.
conclusionsThe results of this research should be of interest to both academics and practitioners. The findings propose potential limitations of a blockchain-based HIE that should be addressed by health care organizations to exchange personal health information in a secure and private manner. This study can contribute to the research in the blockchain area and enrich the literature on the use of blockchain in HIE efforts. Practitioners can also identify how to leverage the benefit of blockchain to promote HIE initiatives nationwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.