ArticleStrabismus2019
Vertical vergence in nonhuman primates depends on horizontal gaze position.
Article in Strabismus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Innervation of Cyclovertical Extraocular Muscles During Asymmetric Vertical Vergence.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Primate eye tracking with carbon-nanotube-paper-composite based capacitive sensors and machine learning algorithms.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2024Article
- Spatial-temporal contrast sensitivity of the eye alignment reflex.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this study was to compare vertical fusion capability at different orbital eye positions in normal nonhuman primates and attempt to use this information to isolate the extraocular muscles (EOMs) that mediate vertical vergence. Scleral search coils were used to record movements of both eyes as two normal nonhuman primates (M1, M2) performed a vertical vergence task at different horizontal eye positions. In a control experiment, M1 was also tested at different angles of horizontal vergence. To elicit vertical vergence, a 50° x 50° stimulus comprising a central fixation cross and random dots elsewhere was presented separately to each eye under dichoptic viewing conditions. Vertical disparity was introduced by slowly displacing the stimulus for one eye vertically. Vertical fusion amplitude (maximum disparity that the monkey was able to fuse) and vertical vergence (maximum difference in vertical position of the two eyes) were measured. Vertical fusion capability differed at different orbital eye positions. Monkey M1 had significantly smaller vertical fusion capabilities when the right eye (RE) was abducted than left eye (LE) while M2 had significantly smaller vertical fusion capabilities when the RE was adducted and LE abducted. M1 also showed greater vertical fusion capability for near gaze. M1 data suggested that the vertical recti mediated vertical vergence in the RE and the oblique muscles in the LE while M2 data suggested that the oblique muscles mediated vertical vergence in the RE and the vertical recti in the LE. The variable results within the same animal and across animals suggest that EOM involvement during vertical fusional vergence is idiosyncratic and likely a weighted combination of multiple cyclovertical muscles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.