Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222989›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2019

En-face optical coherence tomography/fluorescence endomicroscopy for minimally invasive imaging using a robotic scanner.

Manuel J Marques, Michael R Hughes, Khushi Vyas, Andrew Thrapp, Haojie Zhang, Adrian Bradu, Grigory Gelikonov, Petros Giataganas, Christopher J Payne, Guang-Zhong Yang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Robotic Optical Coherence Tomography of Human Subjects with Posture-Invariant Head and Eye Alignment in Six Degrees of Freedom.... International Symposium on Medical Robotics. International Symposium on Medical Robotics · 2023
    Article
  3. EndoscopicBiomedical optics express · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Manuel J MarquesUniversity of Kent, School of Physical Sciences, Applied Optics Group, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Michael R HughesUniversity of Kent, School of Physical Sciences, Applied Optics Group, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Khushi VyasImperial College London, Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew ThrappUniversity of Kent, School of Physical Sciences, Applied Optics Group, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Haojie ZhangImperial College London, Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, London, United Kingdom.
Adrian BraduUniversity of Kent, School of Physical Sciences, Applied Optics Group, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Grigory GelikonovInstitute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Petros GiataganasImperial College London, Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher J PayneImperial College London, Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, London, United Kingdom.
Guang-Zhong YangImperial College London, Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, London, United Kingdom.
Adrian PodoleanuUniversity of Kent, School of Physical Sciences, Applied Optics Group, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Kent · GBInstitute of Applied Physics · RU

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a compact rigid instrument capable of delivering en-face optical coherence tomography (OCT) images alongside (epi)-fluorescence endomicroscopy (FEM) images by means of a robotic scanning device. Two working imaging channels are included: one for a one-dimensional scanning, forward-viewing OCT probe and another for a fiber bundle used for the FEM system. The robotic scanning system provides the second axis of scanning for the OCT channel while allowing the field of view (FoV) of the FEM channel to be increased by mosaicking. The OCT channel has resolutions of 25  /  60  μm (axial/lateral) and can provide en-face images with an FoV of 1.6  ×  2.7  mm2. The FEM channel has a lateral resolution of better than 8  μm and can generate an FoV of 0.53  ×  3.25  mm2 through mosaicking. The reproducibility of the scanning was determined using phantoms to be better than the lateral resolution of the OCT channel. Combined OCT and FEM imaging were validated with ex-vivo ovine and porcine tissues, with the instrument mounted on an arm to ensure constant contact of the probe with the tissue. The OCT imaging system alone was validated for in-vivo human dermal imaging with the handheld instrument. In both cases, the instrument was capable of resolving fine features such as the sweat glands in human dermal tissue and the alveoli in porcine lung tissue.

Indexed as

AnimalsDermisDiagnostic ImagingHumansMicroscopy, FluorescencePulmonary AlveoliReproducibility of ResultsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSweat GlandsSwineTomography, Optical Coherencebiomedical opticsendoscopyfluorescencemultimodal imagingscanning

Identifiers

PMID31222989
PMCPMC6977172
OpenAlexW2952641037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.