Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222681›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019

Striving for consistency in the National Wetland Condition Assessment: developing a reference condition approach for assessing wetlands at a continental scale.

Alan T Herlihy, Mary E Kentula, Teresa K Magee, Gregg A Lomnicky, Amanda M Nahlik, Gregg Serenbetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alan T HerlihyDepartment of Fisheries & Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA. alan.herlihy@oregonstate.edu.
Mary E KentulaNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory - Western Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR, 97333, USA.
Teresa K MageeNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory - Western Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR, 97333, USA.
Gregg A LomnickyCSS-Dynamac Corporation, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR, 97333, USA.
Amanda M NahlikNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory - Western Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR, 97333, USA.
Gregg SerenbetzOffice of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, MC4502T, Washington DC, 20460, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the biggest challenges when conducting a continental-scale assessment of wetlands is setting appropriate expectations for the assessed sites. The challenge occurs for two reasons: (1) tremendous natural environmental heterogeneity exists within a continental landscape and (2) reference sites vary in quality both across and within major regions of the continent. We describe the process used to set reference expectations and define a disturbance gradient for the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency's National Wetland Condition Assessment (NWCA). The NWCA employed a probability design and sampled 1138 wetland sites across the conterminous US to make an unbiased assessment of wetland condition. NWCA vegetation data were used to define 10 reporting groups based on ecoregion and wetland type that reduced the naturally occurring variation in wetland vegetation associated with continent-wide differences in biogeography. These reporting groups were used as a basis for defining quantitative criteria for least disturbed and most disturbed conditions and developing indices and thresholds for categories of ecological condition and disturbance. The NWCA vegetation assessment was based on a reference site approach, in which the least disturbed reference sites were used to establish benchmarks for assessing the condition of vegetation at other sites. Reference sites for each reporting group were identified by filtering NWCA sample data for disturbance using a series of abiotic variables. Ultimately, 277 least disturbed sites were used to set reference expectations for the NWCA. The NWCA provided a unique opportunity to improve our conceptual and technical understanding of how to best apply a reference condition approach to assessing wetlands across the US. These results will enhance the technical quality of future national assessments.

Indexed as

WetlandsBenchmarkingConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmentEnvironmental MonitoringUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyReference conditionReference sitesRegional assessmentsRegionalizationWetlands

Identifiers

PMID31222681
PMCPMC6586693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.