Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222605›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2019

A review of neuroimaging studies in generalized anxiety disorder: "So where do we stand?"

Bastiaan Goossen, Jeffrey van der Starre, Colin van der Heiden

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Quality over quantity: powering neuroimaging samples in psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bastiaan GoossenOutpatient Treatment Center GGZ Delfland, Sint Jorisweg 2, 2612 GA, Delft, The Netherlands. b.goossen@ggz-delfland.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3970-0739
Jeffrey van der StarreOutpatient Treatment Center Indigo, Spijkenisse, The Netherlands.
Colin van der HeidenOutpatient Treatment Center Indigo, Spijkenisse, The Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLGGZ Delfland · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a prevalent anxiety disorder, but is still poorly recognized in clinical practice. The aim of this review is to provide a coherent understanding of the functional neuroanatomy of GAD; second, to discuss the current theoretical cognitive models surrounding GAD; and finally to discuss the discrepancy between fundamental research and clinical practice and highlight several potential directions for future research in this domain. A systematic review of original papers investigating the neural correlates of DSM-IV and DSM-5 defined GAD samples was undertaken in Ovid literature search, PubMed, Medline, EMbase, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and TRIP databases. Articles published between 2007 and 2018 were included. First, GAD seems to be characterized by limbic and (pre)frontal abnormalities. More specifically, GAD patients show difficulties in engaging the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) during emotional regulation tasks. Second, the involved brain areas appear to be characterized by heterogeneity possibly due to a variety of experimental designs and test subjects. Third, regarding the discrimination between GAD and other anxiety disorders via fMRI, results appear to be mixed. Studies report both GAD-specific activity and an inability to differentiate between GAD and other anxiety or mood disorders. The usage of different experimental tasks, test subjects, outcome measures and experimental designs limits the possibilities of generalizing results as well as conducting meta-analytical research. Certain theoretical models of GAD describe our understanding of this disorder and form the basis for treatment interventions. However, fMRI research thus far has failed to validate these models. To bridge the gap between fundamental research and clinical practice in GAD, we propose that fMRI researchers make an effort to validate the existing cognitive model of GAD. An alternative approach could be that new models would be based on current neuroimaging research as well as convergent research methods such as Heart Rate Variability (a bottom up approach).

Indexed as

Functional NeuroimagingModels, TheoreticalAnxiety DisordersGyrus CinguliHumansPrefrontal CortexAnxiety disorderGAD theoryGeneralized anxiety disorderNeuroimagingWorry

Identifiers

PMID31222605
OpenAlexW2951119368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.