Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222599›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2019

Google AdWords and Facebook Ads for Recruitment of Pregnant Women into a Prospective Cohort Study With Long-Term Follow-Up.

Marleen M H J van Gelder, Tom H van de Belt, Lucien J L P G Engelen, Robin Hooijer, Sebastian J H Bredie, Nel Roeleveld

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The PRIDE Study: Evaluation of online methods of data collection.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marleen M H J van GelderDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Marleen.vanGelder@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4853-4434
Tom H van de BeltRadboud REshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lucien J L P G EngelenRadboud REshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Robin HooijerRadboud REshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sebastian J H BredieRadboud REshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nel RoeleveldDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives Several types of epidemiologic studies suffer from decreasing participation rates, resulting in potential selection bias and delay or termination of studies. We aimed to determine the feasibility of online methods for recruitment of pregnant women into a prospective cohort study. Methods In addition to traditional recruitment through prenatal care providers, we advertized participation in the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study with long-term follow-up in The Netherlands enrolling women in early pregnancy, through Google AdWords (30 days) and Facebook Ads (31 and 27 days) campaigns between September 2016 and January 2017. We calculated costs per eligible participant and compared demographics, health-related characteristics, and follow-up rates between participants recruited through online methods and prenatal care providers. Results During the study period, we recruited six women through AdWords (€54.28 per participant), 59 through Facebook (€10.17 per participant), and 327 through prenatal care providers (no valid cost estimate available). Facebook participants seemed to be younger (29.0 vs. 30.7 years), to have a higher body mass-index and/or low/intermediate education (27.0 vs. 24.0 kg/m

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdultAdvertisingCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternetNetherlandsPregnancyPregnant PeopleProspective StudiesSocial MediaTime FactorsEpidemiologic methodsInternetParticipant recruitmentPRIDE StudySocial media

Identifiers

PMID31222599
PMCPMC6732125
OpenAlexW2951838216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.