Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222557›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2019

Automated Detection of Measurements and Their Descriptors in Radiology Reports Using a Hybrid Natural Language Processing Algorithm.

Selen Bozkurt, Emel Alkim, Imon Banerjee, Daniel L Rubin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Relevance of advanced imaging analysis units in radiology departments: a narrative review.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Semiautomated pelvic lymph node treatment response evaluation for patients with advanced prostate cancer: based on MET-RADS-P guidelines.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. RadLex Normalization in Radiology Reports.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Selen BozkurtDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Medical School Office Building (MSOB), Room X-335, MC 5464, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94305-5479, USA.
Emel AlkimDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Medical School Office Building (MSOB), Room X-335, MC 5464, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94305-5479, USA.
Imon BanerjeeDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Medical School Office Building (MSOB), Room X-335, MC 5464, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94305-5479, USA.
Daniel L RubinDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Medical School Office Building (MSOB), Room X-335, MC 5464, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94305-5479, USA. dlrubin@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5057-4369
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiological measurements are reported in free text reports, and it is challenging to extract such measures for treatment planning such as lesion summarization and cancer response assessment. The purpose of this work is to develop and evaluate a natural language processing (NLP) pipeline that can extract measurements and their core descriptors, such as temporality, anatomical entity, imaging observation, RadLex descriptors, series number, image number, and segment from a wide variety of radiology reports (MR, CT, and mammogram). We created a hybrid NLP pipeline that integrates rule-based feature extraction modules and conditional random field (CRF) model for extraction of the measurements from the radiology reports and links them with clinically relevant features such as anatomical entities or imaging observations. The pipeline was trained on 1117 CT/MR reports, and performance of the system was evaluated on an independent set of 100 expert-annotated CT/MR reports and also tested on 25 mammography reports. The system detected 813 out of 806 measurements in the CT/MR reports; 784 were true positives, 29 were false positives, and 0 were false negatives. Similarly, from the mammography reports, 96% of the measurements with their modifiers were extracted correctly. Our approach could enable the development of computerized applications that can utilize summarized lesion measurements from radiology report of varying modalities and improve practice by tracking the same lesions along multiple radiologic encounters.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingRadiology Information SystemsAlgorithmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedConditional random fieldsMeasurement extractionNatural language processingRadiology report

Identifiers

PMID31222557
PMCPMC6646482
OpenAlexW2953196299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.