Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222520›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2019

Prevalence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in traditionally managed cattle at the wildlife-livestock interface in South Africa in the absence of control measures.

Petronillah Rudo Sichewo, Eric Marcel Charles Etter, Anita Luise Michel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Challenge Dose Titration in aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Absence of Tuberculosis-CausingInternational journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Will we ever eradicate animal tuberculosis?Irish veterinary journal · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improved detection ofJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Challenges for controlling bovine tuberculosis in South Africa.The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Petronillah Rudo SichewoDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Bovine Tuberculosis and Brucellosis Research Programme, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. psichewo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-4057
Eric Marcel Charles EtterDepartment of Production Animal Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Anita Luise MichelDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Bovine Tuberculosis and Brucellosis Research Programme, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRNational Zoological Gardens of South Africa · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NU2GGH001874-02-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle are the domestic animal reservoir for Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) which also affects other domestic animals, several wildlife species and humans leading to tuberculosis. The study area is in a resource-poor community that is surrounded by several game parks, where M. bovis infection has been previously diagnosed in wildlife. A cross-sectional study was carried out to determine the prevalence of M. bovis infection in 659 cattle from a total of 192 traditionally managed herds using the BOVIGAM® interferon gamma assay (IFN-γ). Infection was confirmed by post mortem examination and M. bovis isolation from three test-positive cattle. Genotyping of the M. bovis isolates was done using spoligotyping and VNTR (variable number of tandem repeats typing). The apparent M. bovis prevalence rate in cattle at animal level was 12% with a true population prevalence of 6% (95% Confidence interval (C.I) 3.8 to 8.1) and a herd prevalence of 28%. Spoligotyping analysis revealed that the M. bovis isolates belonged to spoligotype SB0130 and were shared with wildlife. Three VNTR profiles were identified among the SB0130 isolates from cattle, two of which had previously been detected in buffalo in a game reserve adjacent to the study area. The apparent widespread presence of M. bovis in the cattle population raises a serious public health concern and justifies further investigation into the risk factors for M. bovis transmission to cattle and humans. Moreover, there is an urgent need for effective bTB control measures to reduce infection in the communal cattle and prevent its spread to uninfected herds.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildCattleGenotypeLivestockMinisatellite RepeatsMycobacterium bovisPrevalenceRisk FactorsSouth AfricaTuberculosis, BovineBovine tuberculosis (bTB)CattleMycobacterium bovis (M. bovis)Wildlife-livestock interface

Identifiers

PMID31222520
OpenAlexW2951303170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.