ArticleImmunologic research2019
Immune reconstitution after HSCT in SCID-a cohort of conditioned and unconditioned patients.
Article in Immunologic research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vaccinations in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology: Biologic Basis, Clinical Applications, and Perspectives.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Long-Term Immune Recovery After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for ADA Deficiency: a Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical immunology · 2022Article
- Case Report: A Novel IL2RG Frame-Restoring Rescue Mutation Mimics Early T Cell Engraftment Following Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in a Patient With X-SCID.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Atypical immune phenotype in severe combined immunodeficiency patients with novel mutations in IL2RG and JAK3.Genes and immunity · 2020Article
- Considerations in Preparative Regimen Selection to Minimize Rejection in Pediatric Hematopoietic Transplantation in Non-Malignant Diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the effective mean of immune restoration in severe combined immunodefiency (SCID). Usually, HSCT without cytoreductive conditioning is attempted. Nevertheless, conditioning procedures are still preferred in a subset of patients. Herein, we describe the immunological outcome in a cohort of conditioned and unconditioned patients, from diagnosis, through transplantation, to follow-up. This retrospective study was conducted on 17 patients with SCID (10 conditioned, 7 unconditioned) who later underwent HSCT. Immune reconstitution was assessed in the post-transplant year by quantification of T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) and kappa-deleting recombination excision circles (KRECs), among additional laboratory and clinical evaluations. Unconditioned patients were diagnosed and transplanted earlier. TREC and KREC quantification showed a gradual increase in both groups, with higher levels in the conditioned group. Engraftment percentages differed drastically between groups, favoring the conditioned group. Unconditioned patients were significantly more dependent on intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs). One patient from each group succumbed to disease complications. Conditioning demonstrated superior laboratorial outcomes. Patients with unique characteristics (i.e., consanguinity, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination, impaired access to IVIG) may require personalized considerations. The effort to implement secondary prevention of SCID with newborn screening should continue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.