Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222499›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2019

Current and Future PrEP Medications and Modalities: On-demand, Injectables, and Topicals.

Matthew R Beymer, Ian W Holloway, Craig Pulsipher, Raphael J Landovitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. PrEP Navigator Perceptions of the Implementation of Injectable PrEP on HIV Prevention in Tennessee.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Using Motivational Interviewing to Increase HIV PrEP Initiation and Adherence: a Scoping Review.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew R BeymerDepartment of Health and Mental Health Services, Los Angeles LGBT Center, McDonald/Wright Building, 1625 N Schrader Blvd, Room 114-E, Los Angeles, CA, 90028, USA. mrbeymer@gmail.com.
Ian W HollowayDepartment of Social Welfare, Luskin School of Public Affairs, University of California, Los Angeles, 337 Charles E Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Craig PulsipherAPLA Health, 611 S Kingsley Dr, Los Angeles, CA, 90005, USA.
Raphael J LandovitzDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Nina Thawata Harawa · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
Virology CoreP30AI028697 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KITCHEN, SCOTT G · 1991 to 2018
$39.9M
Postdoctoral Training in Global AIDS Prevention ResearchT32MH080634 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JESSE LAWTON CLARK, Pamina Mae Gorbach · 2007 to 2026
$6.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI028697NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH080634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a potent HIV prevention strategy, but uptake of daily oral PrEP remains low. This review covers PrEP agents currently available and agents and modalities under investigation. RECENT

findingsInjectable ARV preparations have high acceptability among users but are likely to require adherence to 8-week interval injections. Topical microbicide gels and vaginal rings have underperformed by intention-to-treat analyses in efficacy studies, at least in large part due to challenges with adherence and/or sustained use. However, daily oral TDF-FTC also underperformed in randomized, placebo-controlled trials compared to expectations and subsequent real-world pragmatic use. On-demand (2-1-1 dosing strategy for MSM) and injectable PrEP appear to be acceptable among participants in clinical trials. These modalities are particularly compelling alternatives for individuals who either do not want to take a daily medication (both on-demand and injectable) and/or want to take PrEP without a long commitment (on-demand). Emerging modalities such as vaginal films, microneedles, and subdermal implants have numerous advantages but are still in early stages of development.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAdultAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsContraceptive Devices, FemaleEmtricitabineFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansInjectionsMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesTenofovirAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsEmtricitabineTenofovirHIV/AIDSInjectablesMicrobicide gelsOn-demandPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)Vaginal rings

Identifiers

PMID31222499
PMCPMC6719717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.