Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222460›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2019

Individual mesh size for open anterior inguinal hernia repair: an anthropometric study in Turkish male patients.

H Kulacoglu, H Celasin, D Oztuna

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04269330 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Size Mesh and Undersized Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Prospective, Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKonya Meram State HospitalRan2020 to 2020Enrolled200ConditionsGeneral Surgery, Inguinal Hernia, Ventral HerniaArmsComparison of normal and small size mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT04280094 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Can the Ideal Mesh Size be Standardized for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair; An Anthropometric Study in Central Anatolian Male Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorKonya Meram State HospitalRan2020 to 2020Enrolled1ConditionsInguinal Hernia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

H KulacogluAnkara Hernia Center, 1.Cadde 109/5, Bahcelievler, 06490, Ankara, Turkey. hakankulacoglu@hotmail.com.
H CelasinDepartment of Surgery, Lokman Hekim Akay Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
D OztunaDepartment of Biostatistics, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University · TRHernia Center · USLokman Hekim Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo conduct a study to determine the measurements of the inguinal region in male patients with inguinal hernias to reveal the proper mesh size for each patient.

methodsIn this prospective study, the anthropometric measurements were obtained from 100 consecutive adult male patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernias. First, the distance between the pubic tubercle and the medial border of the deep inguinal ring was measured (x). Second, the distance between the inner edge of the inguinal ligament and the uppermost level of the internal oblique aponeurosis at the midpoint of the inguinal ligament corresponding to the Hesselbach triangle was measured (y). Individual mesh sizes were calculated according to the original recommendations for mesh overlap.

resultsThe mean x value was 41.6 mm (22-55 mm), the mean y value was 45.2 mm (30-68 mm). The mean dimensions of the mesh were 126.6 mm × 65.2 mm. The largest mesh was 140 mm × 88 mm, and the smallest one was 107 mm × 62 mm. The mean mesh area was 8320 mm

conclusionsThe intraoperative measurements for ideal mesh size in Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernias may present somewhat different mesh dimensions in many patients. Individualization of mesh size may be of importance in surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Weights and MeasuresHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansIntraoperative PeriodMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTurkeyYoung AdultInguinal herniaLichtenstein repairMeshSize

Identifiers

PMID31222460
OpenAlexW2950583916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.