Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222398›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019

Use of national-scale data to examine human-mediated additions of heavy metals to wetland soils of the US.

Amanda M Nahlik, Karen A Blocksom, Alan T Herlihy, Mary E Kentula, Teresa K Magee, Steven G Paulsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect of heavy metals on toxicogenetic damage of European eels Anguilla anguilla.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda M NahlikOffice of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA. nahlik.amanda@epa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0591-375X
Karen A BlocksomOffice of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Alan T HerlihyDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Mary E KentulaOffice of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Teresa K MageeOffice of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Steven G PaulsenOffice of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil concentrations of 12 heavy metals that have been linked to various anthropogenic activities were measured in samples collected from the uppermost horizon in approximately 1000 wetlands across the conterminous US as part of the 2011 National Wetland Condition Assessment (NWCA). The heavy metals were silver (Ag), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), antimony (Sb), tin (Sn), vanadium (V), tungsten (W), and zinc (Zn). Using thresholds to distinguish natural background concentrations from human-mediated additions, we evaluated wetland soil heavy metal concentrations in the conterminous US and four regions using a Heavy Metal Index (HMI) that reflects human-mediated heavy metal loads based on the number of elements above expected background concentration. We also examined the individual elements to detect concentrations of heavy metals above expected background that frequently occur in wetland soils. Our data show that wetland soils of the conterminous US typically have low heavy metal loads, and that most of the measured elements occur nationally in concentrations below thresholds that relate to anthropogenic activities. However, we found that soil lead is more common in wetland soils than other measured elements, occurring nationally in 11.3% of the wetland area in concentrations above expected natural background (> 35 ppm). Our data show positive relationships between soil lead concentration and four individual landscape metrics: road density, percent impervious surface, housing unit density, and population density in a 1-km radius buffer area surrounding a site. These relationships, while evident on a national level, are strongest in the eastern US, where the highest road densities and greatest population densities occur. Because lead can be strongly bound to wetland soils in particular, maintenance of the good condition of our nation's wetlands is likely to minimize risk of lead mobilization.

Indexed as

Human ActivitiesWetlandsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansMetals, HeavyRisk FactorsSoil PollutantsUnited StatesMetals, HeavySoil PollutantsAnthropogenic disturbanceBackground concentrationsHeavy Metal Index (HMI)Lead (Pb)National Wetland Condition Assessment (NWCA)Trace elements

Identifiers

PMID31222398
PMCPMC6586720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.