Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222184›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2020

Circadian glucocorticoid oscillations preserve a population of adult hippocampal neural stem cells in the aging brain.

M Schouten, P Bielefeld, L Garcia-Corzo, E M J Passchier, S Gradari, T Jungenitz, M Pons-Espinal, E Gebara, S Martín-Suárez, P J Lucassen and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Inflammaging and Brain Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. FoxO3 Modulates Circadian Rhythms in Neural Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

M Schouten *Neuroscience Collaboration, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P Bielefeld *Neuroscience Collaboration, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L Garcia-CorzoBiomedicine Institute of Valencia (IBV), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
E M J PasschierNeuroscience Collaboration, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S GradariCajal Institute, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
T JungenitzInstitute of Clinical Neuroanatomy, Neuroscience Center, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
M Pons-EspinalNeurobiology of miRNA Lab, Neuroscience and Brain Technologies Department, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
E GebaraCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
S Martín-SuárezAchucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, Leioa, Spain.
P J LucassenNeuroscience Collaboration, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H E De VriesDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J L TrejoCajal Institute, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0618-5547
S W SchwarzacherInstitute of Clinical Neuroanatomy, Neuroscience Center, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
D De Pietri TonelliNeurobiology of miRNA Lab, Neuroscience and Brain Technologies Department, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9537-8900
N ToniCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
H MiraBiomedicine Institute of Valencia (IBV), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
J M EncinasAchucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, Leioa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0402-972X
C P FitzsimonsNeuroscience Collaboration, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.p.fitzsimons@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1556-2650
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESGoethe University Frankfurt · DEItalian Institute of Technology · ITUniversity of Lausanne · CHAchucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience · ESAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLIkerbasque · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decrease in adult hippocampal neurogenesis has been linked to age-related cognitive impairment. However, the mechanisms involved in this age-related reduction remain elusive. Glucocorticoid hormones (GC) are important regulators of neural stem/precursor cells (NSPC) proliferation. GC are released from the adrenal glands in ultradian secretory pulses that generate characteristic circadian oscillations. Here, we investigated the hypothesis that GC oscillations prevent NSPC activation and preserve a quiescent NSPC pool in the aging hippocampus. We found that hippocampal NSPC populations lacking expression of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) decayed exponentially with age, while GR-positive populations decayed linearly and predominated in the hippocampus from middle age onwards. Importantly, GC oscillations controlled NSPC activation and GR knockdown reactivated NSPC proliferation in aged mice. When modeled in primary hippocampal NSPC cultures, GC oscillations control cell cycle progression and induce specific genome-wide DNA methylation profiles. GC oscillations induced lasting changes in the methylation state of a group of gene promoters associated with cell cycle regulation and the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Finally, in a mouse model of accelerated aging, we show that disruption of GC oscillations induces lasting changes in dendritic complexity, spine numbers and morphology of newborn granule neurons. Together, these results indicate that GC oscillations preserve a population of GR-expressing NSPC during aging, preventing their activation possibly by epigenetic programming through methylation of specific gene promoters. Our observations suggest a novel mechanism mediated by GC that controls NSPC proliferation and preserves a dormant NSPC pool, possibly contributing to a neuroplasticity reserve in the aging brain.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmAgingAnimalsBrainCell ProliferationGlucocorticoidsHippocampusMaleMiceNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisReceptors, GlucocorticoidGlucocorticoidsReceptors, Glucocorticoid

Identifiers

PMID31222184
PMCPMC7303016
OpenAlexW2952159518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.