Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222122›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Microbial communities in top- and subsoil of repacked soil columns respond differently to amendments but their diversity is negatively correlated with plant productivity.

Corinne Celestina, Jennifer L Wood, James B Manson, Xiaojuan Wang, Peter W G Sale, Caixian Tang, Ashley E Franks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Corinne CelestinaDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0840-9276
Jennifer L WoodDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.
James B MansonDepartment of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, AgriBio the Centre for AgriBiosciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.
Xiaojuan WangDepartment of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, AgriBio the Centre for AgriBiosciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.
Peter W G SaleDepartment of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, AgriBio the Centre for AgriBiosciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-3724
Caixian TangDepartment of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, AgriBio the Centre for AgriBiosciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.
Ashley E FranksDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia. a.franks@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1664-6060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic and inorganic amendments with equivalent nutrient content may have comparable fertilizer effects on crop yield, but their effects on the soil microbial community and subsequent plant-soil-microbe interactions in this context are unknown. This experiment aimed to understand the relationship between soil microbial communities, soil physicochemical characteristics and crop performance after addition of amendments to soil. Poultry litter and synthetic fertilizer with balanced total nitrogen (N) content equivalent to 1,200 kg ha

Indexed as

Plant DevelopmentSoil MicrobiologyBacterial Physiological PhenomenaCrops, AgriculturalFertilizersFungiFertilizers

Identifiers

PMID31222122
PMCPMC6586782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.