Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222081›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Assessment on interactive prospectives of nanoplastics with plasma proteins and the toxicological impacts of virgin, coronated and environmentally released-nanoplastics.

Ponnusamy Manogaran Gopinath, Vinayagam Saranya, Shanmugam Vijayakumar, Mohan Mythili Meera, Sharma Ruprekha, Reshamwala Kunal, Agarwal Pranay, John Thomas, Amitava Mukherjee, Natarajan Chandrasekaran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Microplastics negatively impact ecosystems, human health and cellular proteostasis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Micro-nanoplastic induced cardiovascular disease and dysfunction: a scoping review.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ponnusamy Manogaran GopinathCentre for Nanobiotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, 632014, TN, India.
Vinayagam SaranyaCentre for Nanobiotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, 632014, TN, India.
Shanmugam VijayakumarCentre for Nanobiotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, 632014, TN, India.
Mohan Mythili MeeraCentre for Nanobiotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, 632014, TN, India.
Sharma RuprekhaCentre for Nanobiotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, 632014, TN, India.
Reshamwala KunalCentre for Nanobiotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, 632014, TN, India.
Agarwal PranayCentre for Nanobiotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, 632014, TN, India.
John ThomasCentre for Nanobiotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, 632014, TN, India.
Amitava MukherjeeCentre for Nanobiotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, 632014, TN, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-4278
Natarajan ChandrasekaranCentre for Nanobiotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, 632014, TN, India. nchandrasekaran@vit.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0586-134X
Vellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the concerns about micro- and nano-plastics (NPs) toxicity have been increasing constantly, however the investigations are quiet meager. The present study provides evidences on the toxicological prospectives of virgin-, coronated- and isolated-NPs on human blood cells and Allium cepa root tip, respectively. Several plasma proteins displayed strong affinity towards NPs and produced multi-layered corona of 13 nm to 600 nm size. The coronated-NPs often attracted each other via non-specific protein-protein attraction which subsequently induced protein-induced coalescence in NPs. In the protein point of view, the interaction caused conformational changes and denaturation of protein thereby turned it as bio-incompatible. The coronated-NPs with increased protein confirmation changes caused higher genotoxic and cytotoxic effect in human blood cells than the virgin-NPs. On the other hand, virgin-NPs and the NPs isolated from facial scrubs hindered the root growth and caused chromosome aberration (ring formation, C-mitotic and chromosomal breaks, etc.) in root of Allium cepa. At the outset, the present study highlights the urgent need of scrutinization and regulation of NPs use in medical applications and pre-requisition of additional studies for assessing the bio-accumulation and bio-magnification of NPs.

Indexed as

BioaccumulationAdultBlood ProteinsChromosome AberrationsDNA DamageErythrocytesHumansLymphocytesMaleMeristemMutagensNanoparticlesOnionsPlasticsProspective StudiesProtein BindingBlood ProteinsMutagensPlastics

Identifiers

PMID31222081
PMCPMC6586940
OpenAlexW2951739035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.