Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222044›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2019

Randomised clinical trial of ferric citrate hydrate on anaemia management in haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia: ASTRIO study.

Keitaro Yokoyama, Masafumi Fukagawa, Takashi Akiba, Masaaki Nakayama, Kyoko Ito, Koji Hanaki, Myles Wolf, Hideki Hirakata

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Iron Therapy in Chronic Kidney Disease: Days of Future Past.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Keitaro YokoyamaDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. keitaro@jikei.ac.jp.
Masafumi FukagawaDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takashi AkibaTokyo Next Medical & Hemodialysis Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaaki NakayamaTohoku University Hospital, Miyagi, Japan.
Kyoko ItoMedical Affairs Department, Torii Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Koji HanakiPharmaceutical Division, Japan Tobacco Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
Myles WolfDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1127-1442
Hideki HirakataFukuoka Renal Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan.
Duke University · USJapan Tobacco (Japan) · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPOno Clinic · JPSt. Luke's International Hospital · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ferric citrate hydrate (FC) is an iron-based phosphate binder approved for hyperphosphataemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effects of FC on anaemia management in haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia. We 1:1 randomised 93 patients who were undergoing haemodialysis and being treated with non-iron-based phosphate binders and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) to receive 24 weeks of FC or to continue their non-iron-based phosphate binders (control) in a multicentre, open-label, parallel-design. Phosphate level was controlled within target range (3.5-6.0 mg/dL). The primary endpoint was change in ESA dose from baseline to end of treatment. Secondary endpoints were changes in red blood cell, iron and mineral, and bone-related parameters. Compared with control, FC reduced ESA dose [mean change (SD), -1211.8 (3609.5) versus +1195 (6662.8) IU/week; P = 0.03] without significant differences in haemoglobin. FC decreased red blood cell distribution width (RDW) compared with control. While there were no changes in serum phosphate, FC reduced C-terminal fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 23 compared with control. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. Despite unchanged phosphate and haemoglobin levels, FC reduced ESA dose, RDW, and C-terminal FGF23 compared with control.

Indexed as

AgedAnemiaFemaleFerric CompoundsFibroblast Growth Factor-23Fibroblast Growth FactorsHematinicsHemoglobinsHumansHyperphosphatemiaIronMaleMiddle AgedPhosphatesProspective StudiesRenal Dialysisferric citrateFerric CompoundsFGF23 protein, humanFibroblast Growth Factor-23Fibroblast Growth FactorsHematinicsHemoglobinsIronPhosphates

Identifiers

PMID31222044
PMCPMC6586649
OpenAlexW2953125864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.