Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222026›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Colourimetric analysis of thermally altered human bone samples.

Tristan Krap, Jan M Ruijter, Kevin Nota, Joyce Karel, A Lieke Burgers, Maurice C G Aalders, Roelof-Jan Oostra, Wilma Duijst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Phosphorescence of thermally altered human bone.International journal of legal medicine · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tristan KrapMaastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. t.krap@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2438-3694
Jan M RuijterAmsterdam UMC, Location AMC, department of Medical Biology, Section Anatomy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kevin NotaDepartment of Life Sciences and Technology-Biotechnology-Forensic Science, Van Hall Larenstein, University of Applied Sciences, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Joyce KarelDepartment of Life Sciences and Technology-Biotechnology-Forensic Science, Van Hall Larenstein, University of Applied Sciences, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
A Lieke BurgersAmsterdam UMC, Location AMC, department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maurice C G AaldersAmsterdam UMC, Location AMC, department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roelof-Jan OostraAmsterdam UMC, Location AMC, department of Medical Biology, Section Anatomy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2452-8307
Wilma DuijstMaastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At this moment, no method is available to objectively estimate the temperature to which skeletal remains have been exposed during a fire. Estimating this temperature can provide crucial information in a legal investigation. Exposure of bone to heat results in observable and measurable changes, including a change in colour. To determine the exposure temperature of experimental bone samples, heat related changes in colour were systemically studied by means of image analysis. In total 1138 samples of fresh human long bone diaphysis and epiphysis, varying in size, were subjected to heat ranging from room temperature to 900 °C for various durations and in different media. The samples were scanned with a calibrated flatbed scanner and photographed with a Digital Single Lens Reflex camera. Red, Green, Blue values and Lightness, A-, and B-coordinates were collected for statistical analysis. Cluster analysis showed that discriminating thresholds for Lightness and B-coordinate could be defined and used to construct a model of decision rules. This model enables the user to differentiate between seven different temperature clusters with relatively high precision and accuracy. The proposed decision model provides an objective, robust and non-destructive method for estimating the exposure temperature of heated bone samples.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureBone and BonesColorimetryHumans

Identifiers

PMID31222026
PMCPMC6586926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.