Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31222006›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Myofibroblast modulation of cardiac myocyte structure and function.

Chandan K Nagaraju, Eef Dries, Guillaume Gilbert, Mouna Abdesselem, Nan Wang, Matthew Amoni, Ronald B Driesen, Karin R Sipido

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Therapies on Fibrotic Heart Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chandan K NagarajuDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Division of Experimental Cardiology, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg O/N1 Box 704, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.
Eef DriesDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Division of Experimental Cardiology, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg O/N1 Box 704, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.
Guillaume GilbertDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Division of Experimental Cardiology, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg O/N1 Box 704, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.
Mouna AbdesselemDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Division of Experimental Cardiology, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg O/N1 Box 704, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.
Nan WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Division of Experimental Cardiology, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg O/N1 Box 704, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.
Matthew AmoniDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Division of Experimental Cardiology, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg O/N1 Box 704, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.
Ronald B DriesenDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Division of Experimental Cardiology, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg O/N1 Box 704, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.
Karin R SipidoDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Division of Experimental Cardiology, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg O/N1 Box 704, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium. karin.sipido@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9609-5507
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After myocardial infarction, resident fibroblasts (Fb) differentiate towards myofibroblasts (MyoFb), generating the scar tissue and the interstitial fibrosis seen in the adjacent myocardium. Fb and MyoFb have the potential to interact with cardiac myocytes (CMs) but insight into the phenotype-specific role and mode of interaction is still incomplete. Our objectives are to further define the modulation of CMs by MyoFbs compared to Fbs, as well as the role of direct contact through gap junctions vs. soluble mediators, using Fbs and CMs from pig left ventricle. Fbs were treated to maintain an undifferentiated state (SD-208) or to attain full differentiation to MyoFb (TGF-β1). Fbs and MyoFbs were co-cultured with CMs, with the possibility of direct contact or separated by a Thincert membrane. Only in direct co-culture, both Fbs and MyoFbs were able to decrease CM viability after 2 days. Only MyoFbs induced significant distal spreading of CMs in both direct and indirect co-culture. MyoFbs, but not Fbs, readily made connections with CMs in direct co-culture and connexin 43 expression in MyoFb was higher than in Fb. When coupled to CMs, MyoFbs reduced the CM action potential duration and hyperpolarized the CM resting membrane potential. Uncoupling reversed these effects. In conclusion, MyoFbs, but not Fbs, alter the CM structural phenotype. MyoFbs, but not Fbs, are likely to electrically connect to CMs and thereby modulate the CM membrane potential. These data provide further support for an active role of MyoFbs in the arrhythmogenic substrate after cardiac remodelling.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCoculture TechniquesMembranes, ArtificialMyocytes, CardiacMyofibroblastsSwineTransforming Growth Factor beta1Membranes, ArtificialTransforming Growth Factor beta1

Identifiers

PMID31222006
PMCPMC6586929
OpenAlexW2951962484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.